Simulation in undergraduate paediatrics: a cluster-randomised trial

Benita Morrissey1,2, Hannah Jacob3, Erika Harnik4

  • 1Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, Magdala Avenue, London, UK. benita.morrissey@nhs.net.

The Clinical Teacher
|December 3, 2015
PubMed

Insights

A 1-day pediatric simulation course significantly boosted medical students' confidence in recognizing, assessing, and managing sick children. This innovative training is highly valued by students for its realistic, safe learning environment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Pediatric Training
  • Simulation-Based Learning

Background:

  • Medical students often lack confidence in managing unwell pediatric patients.
  • There is a need for effective training methods to improve pediatric assessment skills.
  • Simulation offers a safe environment for practicing clinical skills.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a 1-day pediatric simulation course on medical students' abilities.
  • To assess students' confidence in recognizing, assessing, and managing sick children.
  • To gather student feedback on the utility of simulation in pediatric education.

Main Methods:

  • A cluster-randomized trial with a mixed-methods design was employed.
  • Students were randomized into a simulation intervention group or a standard pediatric attachment control group.
  • The primary outcome was self-reported student confidence and ability in pediatric patient management.

Main Results:

  • The simulation group showed significantly higher self-assessed confidence compared to the control group (p < 0.001).
  • Key themes included increased confidence in emergencies and appreciation for human factors.
  • Students found the simulation valuable and recommended it for all undergraduates.

Conclusions:

  • A 1-day pediatric simulation course effectively enhances medical students' confidence in managing unwell children.
  • Simulation-based training is a valuable adjunct to undergraduate pediatric education.
  • Further research should explore long-term impacts on clinical performance.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
368
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.5K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
208
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.6K