Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

473
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
473
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

317
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
317
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Core principles of responsible generative AI usage in research.

AI and ethics·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Multiverse simulation to explore the impact of analytical choices on type I and type II errors in a reaction time study.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset).

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same journal

Physical activity and academic burnout among middle school students: uncovering cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

CA-MuSiC: a Culture-Aware Multilingual Skill Cognition Model for MOOC review understanding.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

AI-driven psychological and cognitive decision processes in professional practice: a systematic review using music teachers as an instrumental case.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Personality traits explain levels of norm compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder: patient-level participation barriers and ketogenic metabolic therapy as a candidate adjunct.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The effect of cooperative learning on nursing students' creative thinking disposition and self-regulated learning.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K

Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations.

Balazs Aczel1, Bence Bago2, Aba Szollosi1

  • 1Institute of Psychology, Eotvos Lorand University Budapest, Hungary.

Frontiers in Psychology
|December 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Questioning the interchangeability of decision bias tasks, this study found that different versions do not reliably measure the same cognitive failure or underlying construct. Understanding domain-specificity is crucial for accurate bias assessment.

Keywords:
decision biasesdecision makingheuristics and biasesindividual differencesmultiple-bias questionnaires

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individual differences in susceptibility to heuristics and biases (HB) are typically measured using multiple-bias questionnaires.
  • These questionnaires assume different bias tasks are interchangeable and measure the same underlying construct.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of assumptions underlying multiple-bias questionnaires.
  • To examine the interchangeability and construct validity of different decision bias tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1: Developed two versions of a decision bias survey with 13 modified HB tasks (N=1279).
  • Study 2: Created three surveys using three original HB tasks for seven biases, allocating one task per survey (N=527).
  • Analyzed internal consistency and factor patterns of responses.

Main Results:

  • Both studies revealed weak internal consistency within surveys.
  • Significant discrepancies were found between extracted underlying factor patterns.
  • Results questioned the interchangeability of different HB task examples and their measurement of a single construct.

Conclusions:

  • The assumption that diverse decision bias tasks are interchangeable is not supported.
  • Domain-specificity and task-specific factors (wording, response mode) significantly influence bias susceptibility.
  • Further research is needed to refine the measurement of cognitive biases.