Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Marginal bone level changes and implant stability after loading are not influenced by baseline microstructural bone
Danilo Rocha Dias1, Cláudio Rodrigues Leles2, Christina Lindh3
1Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different bone tissue characteristics of implant sites on changes in marginal bone level and implant stability over time.
Material And Methods:
One hundred and one implants were inserted in 41 patients. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar ridge was measured on computed tomography (CT) images. Histomorphometric and microtomographic analyses (microCT) were performed in bone specimens obtained by using a trephine bur, at first drilling. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was registered at implant insertion. Implant stability quotient was measured also at the stages of uncovering, loading and at the 1-year follow-up, when standardized periapical radiographs were taken to measure the marginal bone level (MBL). Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rho correlation and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis (P < 0.05).
Results:
Comparison between groups of higher and lower values of ISQ changes and between groups of higher and lower values of MBL changes revealed no differences in histomorphometric and microtomographic parameters, according to non-parametric comparison tests, (P > 0.05). Bivariate correlation also showed no association among these microstructural parameters and the outcomes evaluated. There was no correlation between cortical thickness and MBL changes (r = -0.029; P = 0.832) and between cortical thickness and ISQ changes (r = 0.145; P = 0.292).
Conclusion:
Microstructural bone characteristics of implant sites have no effect on changes in marginal bone level and implant stability as measured by RFA. Bone morphology cannot predict implant treatment success over time.
