Making the Grade: The Impact of Low-Grade Toxicities on Patient Preference for Treatment With Novel Agents
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
Emily H Castellanos1, Sheau-chiann Chen1, Hillary Drexler1
1From the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Division of Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Background:
Targeted therapies have shown clinical benefit in the treatment of solid tumors. The toxicity profiles and treatment duration and schedule of these agents differ considerably from those of traditional chemotherapy. Many studies of targeted therapies report sizeable numbers of grade 1 or 2 toxicities. We sought to determine whether anticipation of low-grade toxicities and treatment logistics impact patient willingness to undergo therapy.
Patients And Methods:
A total of 209 patients with cancer (101 lung and 108 breast) were surveyed at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center regarding willingness to comply with treatment based on anticipated efficacy, dosing convenience, and toxicity profiles. All toxicities were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grade 1 and 2. Willingness to comply with treatment depending on toxicity, anticipated benefit, cancer type, and dosing convenience was compared.
Results:
A substantial number of patients (2.9%-48.8%, depending on the toxicity described) professed unwillingness to undergo treatment because of anticipated grade 1 and 2 toxicities. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities had a stronger negative impact on patient willingness to undergo therapy than dermatologic toxicity. Patients with lung cancer were significantly more likely to accept dermatologic and gastrointestinal toxicities than those with breast cancer. Willingness to tolerate toxicities correlated with expected benefit in terms of life expectancy and chance of cure. Lengthy travel distance for treatment negatively impacted willingness to undergo treatment.
Conclusions:
Anticipation of low-grade toxicities and dosing inconvenience negatively impacts patient willingness to be treated, which may affect adherence and therapeutic outcomes from therapy. Long-term tolerability should be considered when developing and assessing the impact of novel agents.
Insights
Patient willingness to undergo targeted cancer therapy is negatively impacted by anticipated low-grade toxicities and treatment logistics. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving patient adherence and therapeutic outcomes in cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Targeted therapies offer clinical benefits for solid tumors but have distinct toxicity profiles compared to traditional chemotherapy.
- Numerous studies report frequent grade 1 and 2 toxicities associated with targeted agents.
- The impact of anticipating low-grade toxicities and treatment logistics on patient willingness to undergo therapy requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess how anticipated low-grade toxicities (grade 1 and 2) and treatment logistics influence patient willingness to comply with targeted cancer therapy.
- To compare patient willingness across different toxicity types, anticipated benefits, cancer types, and dosing convenience.
Main Methods:
- A survey of 209 cancer patients (101 lung, 108 breast) at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center.
- Patients reported willingness to comply based on efficacy, dosing convenience, and toxicity profiles (CTCAE v4.0 grade 1 and 2).
- Statistical comparisons were made based on toxicity, benefit, cancer type, and convenience.
Main Results:
- A significant percentage of patients (2.9%-48.8%) expressed unwillingness to undergo treatment due to anticipated grade 1 and 2 toxicities.
- Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities more strongly deterred patients than dermatologic toxicities.
- Lung cancer patients were more accepting of dermatologic and gastrointestinal toxicities than breast cancer patients.
- Willingness to tolerate toxicities correlated with expected survival benefit and cure probability.
- Long travel distances for treatment reduced patient willingness.
Conclusions:
- Anticipation of low-grade toxicities and inconvenient dosing schedules negatively affects patient willingness to receive targeted cancer therapy, potentially impacting adherence and outcomes.
- Long-term tolerability of novel agents is a critical factor to consider during their development and assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Drug Toxicity: Overview

