Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

43.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.9K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

209
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
209
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification01:14

Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification

1.3K
When drugs are administered, they can elicit either an agonist or antagonist effect on the body. Agonism occurs when a drug activates a specific receptor, triggering a biological response. On the other hand, antagonism happens when a drug binds to the same receptors but blocks their activation, thereby preventing a biological response.
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
1.3K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

315
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
315
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Taming big data: Applying the experimental method to naturalistic data sets.

Behavior research methods·2019
Same author

Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects.

Scientific data·2016
Same author

Purity homophily in social networks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2016
Same author

A person-centered approach to moral judgment.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2015
Same author

Identity, causality, and pronoun ambiguity.

Topics in cognitive science·2014
Same author

A solution to the challenge of optimization on ''golf-course''-like fitness landscapes.

PloS one·2013
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Language Use and Coalition Formation in Multiparty Negotiations.

Eyal Sagi1, Daniel Diermeier2

  • 1Psychology Department, University of St. Francis.

Cognitive Science
|December 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Negotiation success hinges on aligned positions, with language similarity indicating conceptual alignment. Successful agreements correlate with increased language similarity during talks, especially for financially efficient outcomes.

Keywords:
Coalition formationLatent semantic analysisLinguistic entrainmentNegotiationPsycholinguistics

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Successful negotiation requires aligned bargaining positions.
  • Prior research links language similarity to conceptual alignment between interlocutors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the development of language similarity in three-party negotiations.
  • To determine the relationship between language similarity and negotiation outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) was employed.
  • Language use patterns of negotiating parties were tracked over time.

Main Results:

  • A gradual increase in language similarity was observed in parties reaching an agreement.
  • Financial efficiency of the outcome was positively correlated with language similarity between key parties.

Conclusions:

  • Language similarity is a key indicator and facilitator of successful negotiation.
  • Increasing language similarity may lead to more financially efficient negotiation outcomes.