Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Physiological Experimentation with the Crayfish Hindgut: A Student Laboratory Exercise
Published on: January 18, 2011
Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR)
1Karl and Veronica Carstens - Foundation, Essen, Germany.
Insights
A new checklist improves Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR) quality. This guideline aids authors and journals in ensuring robust scientific reporting for biochemical and biological studies.
Area of Science:
- Homeopathy
- Biochemical Research
- Biological Research
Background:
- Lack of standardized guidelines for reporting basic research in homeopathy.
- Existing guidelines are common in clinical research, but not basic science.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop a criteria catalogue for Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR).
- Improve the quality and validity of homeopathic basic research publications.
Main Methods:
- A Delphi process involving experts in homeopathic experimental work.
- Five rounds of adjustments and phrasing, culminating in two consensus conferences.
Main Results:
- A 23-item checklist (REHBaR) with detailed examples for publication.
- Mandatory inclusion of background, objectives, hypotheses, detailed methods (controls, setup, replication, statistics), results, and discussion.
Conclusions:
- REHBaR enhances the quality and validity of homeopathic basic research.
- The checklist serves as a first step towards consensus on necessary information for publications.
- The catalogue establishes standards for good basic research in homeopathy.
Introduction:
The aim of this study was to develop a criteria catalogue serving as a guideline for authors to improve quality of Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR). Main focus was in the field of biochemical and biological experiments. So far, there was no guideline for scientists and authors available, unlike criteria catalogues common in clinical research.
Methods:
A Delphi Process was conducted among experts who published experimental work within the last five years in this field. The process included a total of five rounds, three rounds of adjusting and phrasing plus two consensus conferences.
Results:
A checklist of 23 items was achieved, augmented with detailed examples how to handle each item while compiling a publication. Background, objectives and possible hypotheses are necessary to be given in the part 'introduction'. The section 'materials and methods' is the most important part, where a detailed description of chosen controls, object of investigation, experimental setup, replication, parameters, intervention, allocation, blinding, and statistical methods is mandatory. In the 'results' section sufficient details on analysed data, descriptive as well as inferential are needed. Moreover, authors should discuss their results and interpret them in the context of current evidence. REHBaR was compiled for authors when preparing their manuscripts, and to be used by scientific journals in the reviewing process.
Conclusions:
Reporting experiments in basic research in homeopathy is an important issue to state the quality and validity of gained results. A guideline for REHBaR seemed to be the first step to come to a commitment what information is necessary to be given in a paper. More than that, the catalogue can serve as a statement what the standards in good basic research should be.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Data Collection by Experiments
An example of the experimental method is a public...
What is an Experiment?
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Blind Procedures
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

