Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.2K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.2K
Microbial Phylogeny01:28

Microbial Phylogeny

63
Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...
63
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

8.4K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.4K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.8K
3.8K
Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

64.5K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
64.5K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

51.8K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
51.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomechanical and morphological determinants of maximal jumping performance in callitrichine monkeys.

The Journal of experimental biology·2024
Same author

Jumping performance in tree squirrels: Insights into primate evolution.

Journal of human evolution·2023
Same author

Using BayesModelS to provide Bayesian- and phylogenetically-informed primate body mass predictions.

Journal of human evolution·2021
Same author

Footloose: Articular surface morphology and joint movement potential in the ankles of lorisids and cheirogaleids.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same author

Predicting body mass of bonobos (Pan paniscus) with human-based morphometric equations.

American journal of primatology·2020
Same author

Minority stress, social integration, and the mental health needs of LGBTQ asylum seekers in North America.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2019
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.3K

The Independent Evolution Method Is Not a Viable Phylogenetic Comparative Method.

Randi H Griffin1, Gabriel S Yapuncich1

  • 1Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

Plos One
|December 20, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Independent Evolution (IE) is a flawed phylogenetic comparative method (PCM). This study demonstrates IE produces biased evolutionary rate estimates and offers no advantages over existing methods like phylogenetically independent contrasts.

More Related Videos

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.7K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

752

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.3K
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.7K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

752

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Quantitative genetics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) are crucial for understanding evolutionary processes using species traits and phylogenetic data.
  • A novel PCM, Independent Evolution (IE), was recently proposed, claiming improved ancestral state reconstruction and branch-specific evolutionary rate estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the theoretical and computational soundness of the Independent Evolution (IE) phylogenetic comparative method.
  • To assess the accuracy and utility of IE in estimating ancestral states and evolutionary rates compared to established PCMs.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated evolutionary data under a Brownian motion model.
  • Applied the Independent Evolution (IE) method to simulated data.
  • Compared IE's performance with established PCMs, including phylogenetically independent contrasts.

Main Results:

  • IE produced severely biased estimates of ancestral states and branch-specific evolutionary changes when data followed Brownian motion.
  • IE's branch-specific changes were identified as simple ancestor-descendant contrasts, lacking novelty.
  • Regressing IE-estimated branch changes yielded biased scaling relationship estimates, offering no improvement over existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The Independent Evolution (IE) method suffers from significant theoretical and computational flaws.
  • IE does not provide accurate evolutionary rate estimates or novel insights beyond established PCMs.
  • The use of Independent Evolution (IE) in phylogenetic comparative analyses is not recommended.