Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

08:31
The Calibration and Use of Capacitance Sensors to Monitor Stem Water Content in Trees
Published on: December 27, 2017
13.3K
[Application of three heat pulse technique-based methods to determine the stem sap flow]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao = the Journal of Applied Ecology
|December 22, 2015
Summary
Accurate tree sap flow measurement is crucial for understanding forest water dynamics. This study compared heat pulse methods, finding the Single-Probe Heat Pulse Probe (SHPP) and Heat-Ratio Method (HRM) most promising for reliable sap flow density (Vs) data.
Area of Science:
- Forest Ecology
- Plant Physiology
- Hydrology
Background:
- Understanding tree water use is vital for forest ecology and ecosystem water exchange.
- Sap flow methodology provides critical data on tree transpiration.
- Tri-probe heat pulse sensors are commonly used for thermal measurements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy and reliability of different sap flow density (Vs) measurement methods using tri-probe heat pulse sensors.
- To evaluate the performance of Heat-Ratio Method (HRM), T-Max method, and Single-Probe Heat Pulse Probe (SHPP) against a standard Thermal Diffusion Probe (TDP).
- To determine the optimal method or combination of methods for measuring stem sap flow in Salix matsudana.
Main Methods:
- Utilized tri-probe heat pulse sensors to measure Salix matsudana sap flow density (Vs).
- Applied Heat-Ratio Method (HRM), T-Max method, and Single-Probe Heat Pulse Probe (SHPP) for Vs estimation.
- Compared results with measurements from Grainer's Thermal Diffusion Probes (TDP).
Main Results:
- A stable measurement stage was reached approximately five weeks after sensor installation.
- Early-stage Vs measurements were 135%-220% higher than stable-stage measurements.
- HRM, T-Max, and SHPP showed strong linear correlations with TDP (R²=0.93, 0.73, 0.91 respectively).
- SHPP and HRM achieved the highest correlation (R²=0.94) and HRM excelled in measuring low and reverse sap flow.
- SHPP offered simplicity and accuracy but couldn't determine flow direction; T-Max had higher errors and limitations at low flow rates.
Conclusions:
- SHPP and HRM are highly promising for accurate sap flow density (Vs) measurements.
- The T-Max method has limitations and is best used in conjunction with other methods.
- Choosing the appropriate sap flow measurement technique or combination depends on specific research objectives.

