Fracture of the Medial Humeral Epicondyle in Children: A Comparison of Operative and Nonoperative Management

Insights

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for medial epicondylar fractures yields similar good outcomes for displaced fractures. However, nonoperative care may lead to more radiographic deformity and instability.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Traumatology
  • Elbow Fractures

Background:

  • Medial epicondylar fractures are common elbow injuries.
  • Treatment decisions involve operative versus nonoperative approaches.
  • Outcomes can vary based on fracture displacement and incarceration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment for medial epicondylar fractures.
  • To evaluate the impact of fracture displacement and incarceration on treatment success.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 31 medial epicondylar fractures in 30 patients.
  • Classification into nondisplaced, incarcerated, and displaced (non-incarcerated) groups.
  • Clinical assessment using follow-up examination and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) elbow score.
  • Radiographic evaluation for deformity and instability.

Main Results:

  • All groups achieved high JOA elbow scores (94-98).
  • Nonunion occurred only in a fracture with an incarcerated fragment.
  • Displaced, non-incarcerated fractures showed good outcomes with both operative and nonoperative treatment.
  • Nonoperative treatment for displaced fractures resulted in higher rates of radiographic deformity and instability.

Conclusions:

  • Both operative and nonoperative management can yield satisfactory clinical outcomes for displaced medial epicondylar fractures.
  • Nonoperative treatment of displaced fractures may increase the risk of radiographic abnormalities.
  • Fractures with incarcerated fragments warrant careful consideration due to potential for nonunion.