Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Study of a Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Published on: March 3, 2023
Clinical decision support software for diabetic foot risk stratification: development and formative evaluation.
Deborah E Schoen1, David G Glance2, Sandra C Thompson3
1Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, M706, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009 WA Australia.
This study developed an electronic tool to predict diabetic foot complications. Iterative feedback and testing ensured the tool accurately reflects Australian Guidelines for better prevention programs.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
- Diabetic Foot Complications
Background:
- Diabetic foot complications pose a significant risk, necessitating effective prevention in primary healthcare.
- Diabetic foot risk stratification systems are crucial for predicting ulceration.
- Developing user-centered tools is key for successful implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore end-user experiences during the development of an electronic diabetic foot risk stratification tool.
- To evaluate the accuracy of the developed tool against evidence-based guidelines.
- To refine the tool based on formative evaluation and user feedback.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach was used over eight months, incorporating formative evaluation.
- Methods included semi-structured interviews, focus groups, participant observation, and online surveys.
- Expert review, guideline comparison, and clinical testing were integral to the evaluation.
Main Results:
- 43 healthcare practitioners participated in trialling the clinical decision support system.
- User feedback led to significant software modifications, addressing design flaws and functional limitations.
- The final tool accurately calculates risk and provides recommendations aligned with Australian Guidelines.
Conclusions:
- An iterative, multidisciplinary development process involving feedback and testing optimizes computerised clinical decision support systems.
- Evidence-based guidelines are essential for developing accurate diabetic foot risk stratification tools.
- Collaboration between end-users and technology experts enhances tool development and clinical utility.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
