Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Muscarinic receptor differentiation.

F Mitchelson1, L K Choo, S Darroch

  • 1School of Pharmacology, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Parkville, Australia.

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacological Agents Affecting Emesis : A Review (Part II).

Drugs·2017
Same author

Effects of muscarinic agonists in the guinea-pig prostate.

Autonomic & autacoid pharmacology·2007
Same author

Cellular signaling mechanisms for muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Receptors & channels·2003
Same author

The allosteric interaction of otenzepad (AF-DX 116) at muscarinic M2 receptors in guinea pig atria.

European journal of pharmacology·2001
Same author

The autonomic and sensory innervation of the smooth muscle of the prostate gland: a review of pharmacological and histological studies.

Journal of autonomic pharmacology·2001
Same author

Characterisation of the prejunctional inhibitory muscarinic receptor on cholinergic nerves in the rat urinary bladder.

European journal of pharmacology·2001

Selective antagonists help differentiate muscarinic receptors, suggesting further M1 and M2 subtypes are possible. However, discrepancies in binding studies and receptor-mechanism coupling require further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Receptor Science

Background:

  • Muscarinic receptors are key targets in various physiological processes.
  • Selective antagonists are crucial tools for dissecting receptor function.
  • Existing knowledge suggests heterogeneity within muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the potential for further subdivision of M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors.
  • To investigate the reasons behind discrepancies in affinity constant determinations.
  • To examine the exclusive coupling of receptor subtypes to specific cellular mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing selective antagonists to differentiate muscarinic receptor subtypes.
  • Analyzing studies involving cloned receptors to support subtype classification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing affinity constants derived from functional and binding assays.

    • Main Results:

    • Selective antagonists facilitate the differentiation of muscarinic receptors.
    • Evidence from cloned receptors supports the potential subdivision of M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors.
    • Differences in affinity constants between functional and binding studies persist.

    Conclusions:

    • The existence of distinct M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor subtypes is supported by current evidence.
    • Further research is needed to reconcile discrepancies in affinity measurements.
    • The exclusive coupling of specific receptor subtypes to cellular mechanisms remains an open question.