Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

06:53
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
Published on: March 1, 2017
13.9K
Forming Beliefs: Why Valence Matters.
1Affective Brain Laboratory, Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|December 26, 2015
Summary
People learn differently from good versus bad news, especially for self-relevant beliefs. This information valence asymmetry creates a positive bias, impacting individuals and society.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Neuroscience
- Behavioral economics
Background:
- Information valence (good or bad news) is a key attribute.
- Classic learning theories assume belief adjustment is valence-independent.
- Evidence suggests distinct mechanisms for learning from desirable vs. undesirable information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on valence-dependent learning.
- To explore the positive bias in self-relevant beliefs.
- To characterize the neural basis and individual differences in this asymmetry.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on information processing and belief updating.
- Analysis of behavioral and neuroimaging data related to valence.
- Examination of individual differences in response to desirable and undesirable information.
Main Results:
- Learning and belief updating are asymmetric based on information valence.
- This asymmetry results in a positive bias for self-relevant information.
- Specific neural circuits underpin this valence-dependent learning, with variations linked to behavior.
Conclusions:
- Belief adjustment is not uniform across information types.
- The positive bias has significant individual and societal implications.
- Understanding the neural basis of valence asymmetry is crucial for explaining behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
51.5K
Overview of Valence Bond Theory
51.5K
Valence Bond Theory
11.6K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
11.6K
Valence Bond Theory and Hybridized Orbitals
33.0K
According to valence bond theory, a covalent bond results when: (1) an orbital on one atom overlaps an orbital on a second atom, and (2) the single electrons in each orbital combine to form an electron pair. The strength of a covalent bond depends on the extent of overlap of the orbitals involved. Maximum overlap is possible when the orbitals overlap on a direct line between the two nuclei.
A σ bond (single bond in a Lewis structure) is a covalent bond in which the electron density is...
A σ bond (single bond in a Lewis structure) is a covalent bond in which the electron density is...
33.0K
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
14.8K
The molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in a manner similar to the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a molecular orbital. Mathematically, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) generates molecular orbitals. Combinations of in-phase atomic orbital wave functions result in regions with a high probability of electron density, while...
14.8K
Molecular Orbital Theory II
28.4K
Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams
28.4K
Lewis Symbols and the Octet Rule
85.6K
Chemical bonds are complex interactions between two or more atoms or ions, which reduce the potential energy of the molecule. Gilbert N. Lewis developed a model called the Lewis model that simplified the depiction of chemical bond formation and provided straightforward explanations for the chemical bonds seen in most common compounds.
85.6K

