Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development01:14

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

1.2K
The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...
1.2K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

43.1K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
43.1K
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

664
Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...
664
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

460
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
460
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

22.4K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
22.4K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.9K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same author

Tracking fraction knowledge development using grade-appropriate assessments.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Math language matters: math-specific verbal skills, not analog representation of non-symbolic magnitudes, predict symbolic fraction abilities in primary school children.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same author

Developmental Changes in Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Fractions Processing: A Cross-Sectional fMRI Study.

Developmental science·2025
Same author

A bird's-eye view of research practices in mathematical cognition, learning, and instruction: Reimagining the status quo.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024
Same author

Fostering diversity in mathematics cognition.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

5.1K

Individual Differences in Nonsymbolic Ratio Processing Predict Symbolic Math Performance.

Percival G Matthews1, Mark Rose Lewis2, Edward M Hubbard2

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison pmatthews@wisc.edu.

Psychological Science
|December 30, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Basic nonsymbolic ratio-processing abilities (RPS) support understanding of abstract mathematical concepts like fractions. Individual differences in RPS acuity predict mathematical competence, challenging prior theories.

Keywords:
educational psychologyindividual differencesmathematical abilitynumber comprehensionperception

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.2K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

5.1K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.2K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Mathematical Cognition

Background:

  • Traditional theories suggest core numerical systems, like the approximate number system (ANS), are inadequate for learning fractions.
  • Advanced numerical concepts, such as fractions, are often thought to rely solely on higher-order logic and language.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the foundational nonsymbolic abilities underlying advanced numerical cognition.
  • To determine if a ratio-processing system (RPS) supports the understanding of fraction concepts.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed individual differences in ratio-processing system (RPS) acuity.
  • Correlated RPS acuity with performance on multiple mathematical competence measures, including an algebra entrance exam.

Main Results:

  • RPS acuity significantly predicted performance across four mathematical competence measures.
  • This finding supports the hypothesis that nonsymbolic ratio processing is crucial for fraction understanding.

Conclusions:

  • The nonsymbolic ratio-processing system (RPS) may provide a foundation for symbolic fraction understanding, similar to how the ANS supports whole-number concepts.
  • Abstract mathematical concepts, including fractions, are grounded in basic nonsymbolic processing abilities, not just abstract reasoning.