Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026
Injection of Porcine Adipose Tissue-Derived Stroma Cells via Waterjet Technology
Published on: November 23, 2021
Urodynamic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Delivery Using Low Energy Shock Waves
Yao-Chi Chuang1, Tung-Liang Huang2, Pradeep Tyagi3
1Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Purpose:
We investigated the feasibility of using low energy shock waves for intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery. We also evaluated its efficacy for acetic acid induced bladder hyperactivity in rats.
Materials And Methods:
In study 1 magnetic resonance imaging with intravesical administration of Gd-DTPA (Gd-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid) contrast medium was performed to visualize increased bladder urothelial permeability after low energy shock waves. In study 2 saline (1 ml) or botulinum toxin A (20 U/1 ml saline) was administered in the bladder with or without low energy shock waves (300 pulses at 0.12 mJ/mm(2)) and retained for 1 hour on day 1. Continuous cystometrograms were performed on day 8 by filling the bladder with saline followed by 0.3% acetic acid. The bladder was harvested for histology, and SNAP-25, SNAP-23 and COX-2 expression by Western blot or immunostaining.
Results:
Magnetic resonance imaging established bladder urothelial leakage of Gd-DTPA after low energy shock waves, which was not seen in controls. The intercontraction interval was decreased 71.9%, 72.6% and 70.6% after intravesical instillation of acetic acid in saline, saline plus low energy shock wave and botulinum toxin A pretreated rats, respectively. However, rats that received botulinum toxin A plus low energy shock waves showed a significantly reduced response (48.6% decreased intercontraction interval) to acetic acid instillation without compromising voiding function. Rats pretreated with botulinum toxin A plus low energy shock waves showed a decreased inflammatory reaction (p <0.05), and decreased expression of SNAP-23 (p <0.05), SNAP-25 (p = 0.061) and COX-2 (p <0.05) compared with the control group.
Conclusions:
Low energy shock waves increased urothelial permeability, facilitated intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery and blocked acetic acid induced hyperactive bladder. These results support low energy shock waves as a promising method to deliver botulinum toxin A without the need for injection.
