Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Isolation and Kv Channel Recordings in Murine Atrial and Ventricular Cardiomyocytes
Published on: March 12, 2013
Common Variant Near HEY2 Has a Protective Effect on Ventricular Fibrillation Occurrence in Brugada Syndrome by
Yukiko Nakano1, Hidenori Ochi2, Yuko Onohara2
1From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan (A.S., C.M., H.I., H.K., H.M., K.S., M.T., Noboru Oda, Nozomu Oda, S. Tomomori, S.K., T.T., Y. O., Y.K., Y.N., Y.W.); Laboratory for Digestive Diseases, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Hiroshima, Japan (D.M., H.O., K.C., Y.N.); Division of Frontier Medical Science, Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Programs for Biomedical Research Graduate School of Biomedical Science (H.O., K.C., Y.H.), and Department of Cellular Biology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine (S. Tashiro), Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; and Division of Cardiology, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan (Y.Y.) nakanoy@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Background:
Risk stratification of Brugada syndrome (BrS) remains controversial and the majority of patients with BrS have no genetic explanation. We investigated relationships between genotypes of 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms reported in a recent genome-wide association study and BrS phenotypes.
Methods And Results:
SCN10A (rs10428132), SCN5A (rs11708996), and downstream from HEY2 (rs9388451) single-nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped and compared between 95 Japanese patients with BrS and 1978 controls. Relationships between the single-nucleotide polymorphisms and clinical characteristics, 12-lead ECG findings, signal-averaged ECG findings, and electrophysiological parameters were also examined in patients with BrS. Both rs10428132 and rs9388451 were significantly associated with BrS (P=2.7×10(-14); odds ratio, 3.0; P=9.2×10(-4); odds ratio, 1.7, respectively). Interestingly, the HEY2 risk allele C was less frequent in BrS patients with ventricular fibrillation than in those without (59% versus 74%; P=4.1×10(-2); odds ratio, 0.5). A significant linear correlation was found between HEY2 genotypes and QTc interval (CC: 422±27 ms; CT: 408±21 ms; and TT: 381±27 ms; P= 4.0×10(-4)). The HEY2 mRNA expression level in the right ventricular specimens from patients with BrS (n=20) was significantly lower in patients with CC genotype than the other genotypes (P=0.04). Additionally, during 63±28 months follow-up periods after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation (n=90), Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves revealed that the cumulative rate of ventricular fibrillation events was significantly lower in cases with HEY2 CC genotype (P=0.04).
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that HEY2 CC genotype may be a favorable prognostic marker for BrS, protectively acting to prevent ventricular fibrillation presumably by regulating the repolarization current.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers

