Related Experiment Videos
Should sex offenders be treated?
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Children's Hospital, South Australia.
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
|June 1, 1989
Summary
This review examines whether treating or punishing sex offenders is more effective. It explores the benefits of treatment for reducing recidivism and improving community safety, particularly for young offenders.
Area of Science:
- Criminology
- Forensic Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Debate on optimal strategies for managing sex offenders.
- Growing interest in therapeutic interventions versus punitive measures.
- Focus on the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of treatment for reducing reoffending.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the arguments for and against treating sex offenders.
- To analyze the potential benefits of treatment for reducing recidivism.
- To specifically consider these issues in the context of young sex offenders.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing research and expert opinions.
- Analysis of arguments supporting treatment over punishment.
- Examination of cost-effectiveness and community safety implications.
Main Results:
- Treatment is often favored for its potential to reduce future offenses.
- Arguments suggest treatment is more cost-effective and beneficial for the community.
- The review specifically addresses the application of these principles to young offenders.
Conclusions:
- Treatment approaches warrant serious consideration for sex offenders.
- Evidence suggests treatment may offer superior outcomes compared to punishment alone.
- Further evaluation is needed, especially concerning young individuals in the justice system.