Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating treatment effectiveness.

G Andrews1

  • 1Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety Disorders, St. Vincent's Hospital, NSW.

The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Loneliness in the workplace: a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

A clinico-radiological review of chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis in paediatrics, adolescents, and adults: demystifying a forgotten differential.

Clinical radiology·2023
Same author

A mixed methods pilot and feasibility open trial of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (<i>iCanADAPT Advanced</i>) for people with advanced cancer with depression and/or anxiety.

Internet interventions·2021
Same author

Meanings and feelings of (Im)mobility in later life: Case study insights from a 'New Mobilities' perspective.

Journal of aging studies·2019
Same author

Randomised controlled trial of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for clinical depression and/or anxiety in cancer survivors (iCanADAPT Early).

Psycho-oncology·2019
Same author

Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis.

Journal of anxiety disorders·2018
Same journal

Letter to the Editor regarding 'Middle childhood profiles of social-emotional competencies and difficulties differentiate risk of health service presentations with adolescent mental disorders'.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic complexity and comorbidity: Implications for identification, outcomes, health care and involuntary treatment.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Defining and measuring psychosocial disability in Australia: Assessment of national surveys and administrative datasets.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Academic performance in children of mothers with perinatal depressive disorder.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule to assess hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities in psychosis: A pilot validation study.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Student wellbeing supports in Australian and New Zealand medical schools: A post-guidance snapshot from a 14-institution survey.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Randomized controlled trials are not always informative for treatment benefit. Less robust research designs can be acceptable if they rule out biases and show positive outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Clinical trial design
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard for evaluating treatment efficacy.
  • Skepticism surrounds treatments lacking placebo-controlled trial data.
  • The informativeness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can be limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue that RCTs are not always informative.
  • To propose that alternative research designs can be acceptable.
  • To identify conditions under which less robust designs provide valid evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of research design limitations.
  • Examination of evidence needed to validate alternative study designs.
  • Identification of factors supporting treatment causality.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Less robust research designs can be acceptable if they independently rule out biases like spontaneous remission, regression to the mean, or placebo effects.
  • Post-treatment follow-up assessments strengthen the validity of less robust designs.
  • Treatment causality can be reasonably inferred even with design limitations if standard treatment, patient compliance, and a dose-response relationship are established.

Conclusions:

  • The exclusive reliance on placebo-controlled trials may be too restrictive.
  • Alternative research methodologies can provide valuable evidence for treatment benefit.
  • Careful consideration of study design and contextual factors is crucial for interpreting treatment outcomes.