Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

08:16
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons
Maja Schlüter1, Alessandro Tavoni2, Simon Levin3
1Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden maja.schlueter@su.se.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|January 8, 2016
Summary
Cooperation in shared resource management can collapse with increased environmental variability or abundance. Scarcity or high variability may stabilize cooperation, but global change impacts are complex.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecological Economics
- Game Theory
Background:
- Sustainable resource use relies on user cooperation to avoid overextraction.
- Self-organized cooperation in common-pool resources is empirically supported under specific conditions.
- Global change threatens to alter the conditions necessary for cooperation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the robustness of cooperation in common-pool resource management under environmental variability.
- To model the effects of changing resource abundance and variability on cooperation.
- To investigate the impact of spatial connectivity on cooperation dynamics.
Main Methods:
- A stylized model of a community harvesting a shared resource.
- Incorporation of social sanctioning to enforce cooperation norms.
- Analysis of environmental variability and resource abundance effects on cooperation.
Main Results:
- Increased resource abundance and slight variability can cause cooperation collapse.
- Resource scarcity or high variability can stabilize cooperation.
- Combined effects of abundance and variability can be reinforcing or counteracting.
- Ecological connectivity can destabilize cooperation in linked communities.
Conclusions:
- Environmental variability and abundance have complex, non-linear effects on cooperation.
- Global change impacts on cooperation are context-dependent and unpredictable.
- Spatial connectivity introduces further complexities to sustainable resource management.
Related Concept Videos
Conformity
47.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
47.0K
Social Proof
30.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
30.8K
Social Exchange Theory
38.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
38.4K
Social Traps
25.5K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
25.5K
Social Loafing
38.2K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.2K
Social Exchange Theory
148
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
148

