Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

677
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
677
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.2K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

581
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
581
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.0K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.0K
What is a Hypothesis?01:14

What is a Hypothesis?

17.1K
A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a  property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague...
17.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DNA transfer when using gloves in burglary simulations.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2022
Same author

Corrigendum to "A probabilistic approach to evaluate salivary microbiome in forensic science when the defense says: 'It is my twin brother'" [Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 57, 102638].

Forensic science international. Genetics·2022
Same author

A probabilistic approach to evaluate salivary microbiome in forensic science when the Defense says: `It is my twin brother'.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2021
Same author

Voiding cystourethrography and <sup>99M</sup>TC-MAG3 renal scintigraphy in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: what is the role of indirect cystography?

Journal of pediatric urology·2019
Same author

More on the question 'When does absence of evidence constitute evidence of absence?' How Bayesian confirmation theory can logically support the answer.

Forensic science international·2019
Same author

Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: A coherent approach to inference and decision.

Forensic science international·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic &#8216;Touch DNA&#8217; Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

16.8K

Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon p-value in forensic science

F Taroni1, A Biedermann1, S Bozza2

  • 1University of Lausanne, School of Criminal Justice, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Forensic Science International
|January 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This paper explains hypothesis testing, including frequentist and Bayesian approaches, and discusses a journal

Keywords:
Bayesian methodologyBayes’ theoremDegrees of beliefFrequentist approachHypothesis testingp-value

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
08:54

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications

Published on: November 5, 2020

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic &#8216;Touch DNA&#8217; Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

16.8K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
08:54

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications

Published on: November 5, 2020

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Inferential Statistics
  • Forensic Science Methodology

Background:

  • Hypothesis testing is a cornerstone of inferential statistics, with frequentist and Bayesian approaches offering distinct methods for evaluating competing hypotheses.
  • A recent controversy arose when a journal decided to reject submissions utilizing null hypothesis testing procedures, sparking debate within the scientific community.
  • Null hypothesis testing, often relying on p-values, is prevalent in forensic science research publications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide forensic science researchers with a foundational understanding of hypothesis testing concepts.
  • To explore the implications of different hypothesis testing methodologies for forensic data analysis.
  • To inform researchers about the ongoing debate surrounding null hypothesis testing and its potential exclusion from publications.

Main Methods:

  • This paper offers a primer on the core concepts of hypothesis testing.
  • It reviews the philosophical underpinnings and practical differences between frequentist and Bayesian statistical schools of thought.
  • The discussion contextualizes a recent journal's editorial decision regarding null hypothesis testing within the forensic science domain.

Main Results:

  • The paper clarifies fundamental statistical concepts relevant to hypothesis evaluation.
  • It highlights the divergent perspectives on decision-making regarding competing hypotheses.
  • The discussion emphasizes the significance of methodological choices in statistical evidence evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Forensic science researchers need to be aware of the different statistical approaches to hypothesis testing.
  • Understanding these concepts is crucial for making informed decisions about statistical methods in research.
  • The ongoing debate necessitates critical consideration of hypothesis testing practices in forensic science.