Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis
Frank Engelhardt1, Sebastian Hahnel2, Verena Preis2
1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Center, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. frank.engelhardt@ukr.de.
Objectives:
Flowable bulk-fill resin bonded composites (RBCs) are supposed to show improved abrasion resistance and fracture toughness in comparison to flowable conventional RBCs.
Materials And Methods:
Specimens of eight flowable RBCs (5× flowable conventional, 3× flowable bulk-fill) were fabricated for testing relative fracture toughness (SENB), relative three-body wear, the Vickers hardness, glass transition Tg (differential scanning calorimetry; DSC) and filler mass fraction (thermal gravimetric analysis; TGA). A laboratory veneering composite was used as a reference. Fracture toughness and wear values were related to this reference. Scanning electron microscope images were evaluated for fraktographical and microstructural investigations. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way Anova, the Bonferroni post hoc test and the Pearson correlation test (α =0.05).
Results:
Relative fracture toughness varied between 0.64 and 1.34 (1.00 = 1.69 MPam½) and relative wear rates between 1.24 and 0.55 (1.00 = 134 μm). The Vickers hardness ranged between 14.4 and 57.2 HV. TGA showed filler fractions between 55 and 77 wt.%. Tg values varied between -67.8 and -40.9 °C. None of the tests identified clear differences between flowable bulk-fills or conventional flowable RBCs. The Pearson correlation coefficient (cc) showed significant correlations (cc > 0.583; p < 0.001) between relative fracture toughness and hardness or filler content. There was a significant correlation (cc = 0.757; p = 0.005) between relative wear and glass transition temperature or between filler fraction and the Vickers hardness (cc > 0.702; p < 0.001). For all filler sizes breakdown was found, where clusters and pre-polymerized particles were partly disintegrated.
Conclusions:
Flowable bulk-fill RBCs showed no improved abrasion resistance and fracture toughness in comparison to flowable conventional RBCs.
Clinical Relevance:
Differences in the properties were higher between the individual materials than between the material groups. Therefore the appropriate material selection may be essential for a clinical success.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
07:04Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I