Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

704
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
704
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.4K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

386
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
386
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.5K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Severe Maternal Morbidity and the Impact of the Covid Pandemic.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same author

Severe maternal morbidity trends over 20 years in a tertiary referral stand-alone maternity unit.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2023
Same author

Analgesia, anaesthesia and obstetric outcome in women with inherited bleeding disorders.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2019
Same author

Aspirin In The Prevention Of Pre-Eclampsia: Where Are We Now?

Irish medical journal·2018
Same author

Modeling MTMM Data from Additive and Multiplicative Covariance Structures: An Audit of Construct Validity Concordance.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Overcoming Problems in Confirmatory Factor Analyses of MTMM Data: The Correlated Uniqueness Model and Factorial Invariance.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Multigroup Comparisons and the Assumption of Equivalent Construct Validity Across Groups: Methodological and

B M Byrne

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 13, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary

    Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) offers superior construct validity evidence compared to Campbell-Fiske methods. Self-concept validity differs across student groups, highlighting the need for careful multigroup comparisons.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
    09:00

    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

    Published on: August 16, 2024

    1.3K
    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
    14:14

    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

    Published on: May 13, 2022

    6.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
    08:27

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

    Published on: September 27, 2019

    7.3K
    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
    09:00

    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

    Published on: August 16, 2024

    1.3K
    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
    14:14

    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

    Published on: May 13, 2022

    6.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Educational Measurement

    Background:

    • Assessing construct validity is crucial for accurate psychological and educational research.
    • Traditional methods like Campbell-Fiske may not fully capture complex validity issues across diverse groups.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare Campbell-Fiske and LISREL confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) for construct validity.
    • To test for construct validity equivalence across different student groups.
    • To demonstrate how construct validity can substantively differ between groups.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a multitrait-multimethod matrix with data from 11th and 12th-grade students.
    • Applied both Campbell-Fiske analysis and LISREL confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
    • Examined multidimensional self-concept using Likert, semantic differential, and Guttman scales.

    Main Results:

    • Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) provided more detailed construct validity evidence within groups.
    • CFA demonstrated superiority by effectively testing for construct validity equivalence across groups.
    • Significant differences in self-concept measurement and structure were found between student groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is methodologically superior to Campbell-Fiske for assessing construct validity.
    • The assumption of group-invariant construct validity is not universally applicable.
    • Findings underscore the importance of examining group-specific construct validity in multigroup comparisons.