Comparison of the Conformations of KRAS Isoforms, K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B, Points to Similarities and Significant

Mayukh Chakrabarti1, Hyunbum Jang1, Ruth Nussinov1,2

  • 1Cancer and Inflammation Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick , Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.

Insights

Ras isoforms K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B exhibit distinct signaling dynamics. Molecular simulations reveal K-Ras4A

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Structural biology

Background:

  • Human RAS genes encode four Ras isoforms, including KRAS variants K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B.
  • KRAS mutations are prevalent in RAS-driven cancers, highlighting the importance of understanding Ras isoform function.
  • K-Ras4A and N-Ras exhibit bimodal signaling due to reversible palmitoylation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate isoform-specific differences between K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
  • To understand how structural variations influence guanine-nucleotide exchange and effector binding.

Main Methods:

  • All-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
  • Analysis of catalytic domain and C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR) dynamics.
  • Comparison of GDP-bound states between K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B.

Main Results:

  • GDP-bound K-Ras4A displays a more exposed nucleotide binding pocket than K-Ras4B, potentially affecting guanine-nucleotide exchange.
  • K-Ras4A exhibits nucleotide-dependent HVR fluctuations, differing from K-Ras4B.
  • Autoinhibited states are unstable in K-Ras4A due to its less charged HVR, unlike K-Ras4B.

Conclusions:

  • Isoform-specific structural and dynamic differences between K-Ras4A and K-Ras4B significantly impact their signaling mechanisms.
  • The instability of autoinhibition in K-Ras4A, attributed to its HVR charge, may be unique compared to K-Ras4B.
  • These findings offer insights into Ras isoform regulation and their roles in cancer.