Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

50.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

409
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
409
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

502
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
502
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

315
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
315
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

13.7K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A survey to detect the presence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Kangaroo Island macropods.

Veterinary microbiology·2010
Same author

Pilot trials in Australia on eradication of footrot by flock specific vaccination.

Veterinary microbiology·2008
Same author

Hormonal responses to a 160-km race across frozen Alaska.

British journal of sports medicine·2007
Same author

The effect of renal and hepatic impairment and of spironolactone on digoxin immunoassays.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·1988
Same author

Spironolactone as a source of interference in commercial digoxin immunoassays.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·1987
Same author

Anomalous serum digoxin concentrations in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine·1986

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K

Longitudinal Patterns of Group Decisions: An Exploratory Analysis.

K P Corfman, J H Steckel, D R Lehmann

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 14, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary

    Group decision-making influence shifts over time. Past decision outcomes promote fairness, with prior

    Area of Science:

    • Social Psychology
    • Group Dynamics
    • Decision-Making Science

    Background:

    • Understanding group decision-making dynamics is crucial for organizational and social behavior.
    • Longitudinal influence patterns within groups remain underexplored.
    • The impact of prior decision outcomes on subsequent influence requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore longitudinal patterns of influence in group decision-making.
    • To investigate how past decision outcomes affect members' relative influence in future joint decisions.
    • To examine the role of equity in moderating influence dynamics.

    Main Methods:

    • Exploratory investigation of group decision-making processes.
    • Analysis of longitudinal data on group interactions and decisions.

    More Related Videos

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.9K
    Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
    13:20

    Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

    Published on: December 5, 2025

    1.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
    06:18

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

    Published on: October 20, 2022

    2.7K
    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.9K
    Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
    13:20

    Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

    Published on: December 5, 2025

    1.3K
  • Focus on scenarios with equally intense member preferences.
  • Main Results:

    • Past decision outcomes significantly influence future group influence.
    • Individuals who lost in prior decisions are more likely to gain influence in subsequent decisions.
    • Evidence suggests a group mechanism promoting equity in influence distribution.

    Conclusions:

    • Group influence is not static and evolves based on historical outcomes.
    • The resolution of disagreements is mediated by a drive for fairness.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the adaptive nature of group influence and equity.