Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

07:05
Use of Human Perivascular Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration
Published on: May 25, 2012
22.2K
Minimally Invasive Surgery Combined with Regenerative Biomaterials in Treating Intra-Bony Defects: A Meta-Analysis.
Shan Liu1,2,3, Bo Hu1,2,3, Yuanyuan Zhang4
1College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Plos One
|January 20, 2016
Summary
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for periodontal intra-bony defects shows no significant difference in outcomes with or without biomaterials. Cost-benefit analysis is crucial for treatment decisions, exploring intrinsic healing potential of MIS alone.
Area of Science:
- Periodontal Surgery
- Regenerative Dentistry
- Evidence-Based Dentistry
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly popular in periodontics for treating intra-bony defects.
- The necessity of regenerative biomaterials in conjunction with MIS remains unclear.
- This study evaluates the efficacy of MIS with biomaterials versus MIS alone.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes of MIS with biomaterials versus MIS alone in treating periodontal intra-bony defects.
- To determine if biomaterials offer significant advantages when used with MIS.
- To inform treatment decisions based on comparative efficacy and potential cost-effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted.
- Searched multiple databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Medline, Embase, etc.) for relevant English publications up to June 2015.
- Key outcomes assessed included probing pocket depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain, gingival margin recession, and radiographic bone fill.
Main Results:
- Four randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria.
- No statistically significant differences were observed between the MIS plus biomaterials group and the MIS alone group for clinical attachment level gain (P=0.32) or probing pocket depth reduction (P=0.40).
- Similarly, no significant differences were found in gingival margin recession (P=0.81) or radiographic bone fill (P=0.64).
Conclusions:
- The meta-analysis indicates that MIS with or without biomaterials yields comparable outcomes for periodontal intra-bony defects.
- The findings suggest that cost-benefit analyses are essential when selecting a therapeutic approach.
- Further research into the intrinsic tissue healing capabilities of MIS without biomaterials is warranted to optimize treatment strategies.

