Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

08:55
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
9.0K
Quantifying the origin of metallic glass formation
W L Johnson1, J H Na2, M D Demetriou1,2
1Keck Laboratory of Engineering, Department of Materials Science, 138-78 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Nature Communications
|January 21, 2016
Summary
The minimum crystal formation time (τX*) in metallic glasses depends on the ratio of glass transition to melting temperatures (Tg/TL) and fragility (m). A new empirical model shows these two parameters alone predict τX* accurately.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Physical Chemistry
Background:
- Crystallization kinetics in undercooled liquids are crucial for material properties.
- The minimum crystallization time (τX*) occurs at a specific 'nose temperature' (T*).
- The role of glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (TL), and fragility (m) in determining τX* is widely studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an empirical expression for predicting the minimum crystallization time (τX*) in metallic glasses.
- To assess the influence of dimensionless parameters like Tg/TL and fragility (m) on τX*.
- To determine if liquid/crystal interfacial free energy is a necessary factor in predicting τX*.
Main Methods:
- Survey and analysis of reported experimental data for TL, Tg, trg (Tg/TL), m, and τX* across various metallic glasses.
- Derivation of a simple empirical expression for τX* based on trg and m.
- Statistical analysis to validate the predictive power of the derived expression.
Main Results:
- A simple empirical expression for τX* was derived, showing exponential dependence on trg and m.
- The derived expression includes two fitting parameters.
- Statistical analysis confirmed that trg and m alone are sufficient to predict τX* within experimental error.
- Liquid/crystal interfacial free energy was found to be unexpectedly absent from the predictive expression for τX*.
Conclusions:
- The minimum crystallization time (τX*) in metallic glasses can be accurately predicted using only the Tg/TL ratio and the fragility parameter (m).
- This finding simplifies the understanding of crystallization kinetics in metallic glasses.
- The study highlights the dominant roles of Tg/TL and m, while suggesting interfacial energy is less critical for predicting τX*.

