A pharmacodynamically guided dose selection of PF-00337210 in a phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors

Justine Yang Bruce1, Patricia M LoRusso2, Priscila H Goncalves2

  • 1Wisconsin Institute for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Room 7105, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. jybruce@medicine.wisc.edu.

Abstract

Insights

PF-00337210, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, showed anticancer activity and VEGFR inhibition at well-tolerated doses. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 6 mg twice daily.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Biomarkers

Background:

  • PF-00337210 is an oral, selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor.
  • Evaluating biomarkers in real-time aids in determining recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) and assessing preliminary anticancer activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PF-00337210.
  • To evaluate the preliminary anticancer activity of PF-00337210 using a composite biomarker approach.

Main Methods:

  • Patients with advanced cancers received escalating doses of PF-00337210 orally, either once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID).
  • Tumor perfusion and vascularity were assessed using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).
  • Blood pressure, soluble VEGFR-2 levels, and hemoglobin levels were monitored to evaluate treatment effects.

Main Results:

  • Forty-six patients were treated; the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at the QD schedule was 8 mg.
  • Common adverse events included hypertension and fatigue, which were manageable.
  • Vascular response was observed in 10 patients, with 5 out of 6 patients at BID doses showing response. Greatest modulation of soluble VEGFR-2 occurred at 6 mg BID.

Conclusions:

  • PF-00337210 demonstrates significant VEGFR inhibition at well-tolerated doses.
  • Antitumor activity and VEGFR inhibition effects were observed, particularly at BID dosing.
  • The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for PF-00337210 was established as 6 mg BID.

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
71
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets01:29

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Advances in genomics have profoundly influenced drug discovery by increasing both the speed and accuracy of pharmaceutical development. Pharmacogenomics, which examines how genetic variation influences drug response, facilitates the identification of novel therapeutic targets and enables patient stratification for personalized treatment. These strategies contribute to improved drug efficacy, minimized adverse effects, and more efficient clinical trial design.Mapping genetic differences...
76
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...
254
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...
76
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment01:08

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment

Hepatic impairment, characterized by decreased liver function, does not uniformly mandate adjustments in drug dosage. Whether dosage modifications are necessary depends on various factors related to the drug's metabolism and elimination pathways. If a drug is primarily excreted via the kidneys and bypasses significant hepatic processing, if it undergoes minimal metabolic transformation in the liver, or if it is volatile and primarily expelled through the lungs, dose adjustments may not be...
340
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism01:24

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

In pediatric care, understanding the nuances of hepatic drug metabolism is crucial, as it significantly differs from that of adults. This divergence is primarily due to the developmental stage of drug-metabolizing enzymes, which affects how medications are processed in the body. In neonates, for instance, the activity of Phase I enzymes—critical for the initial breakdown of drugs—is markedly reduced, functioning at just 20–40% of the levels seen in adults. This reduction poses...
328