Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

23:56
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
17.4K
Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory
Z Sidiq1, M Hanif1, K K Chopra1
1New Delhi Tuberculosis Centre, New Delhi, India.
Summary
Quality assurance for tuberculosis diagnosis is crucial. Random blinded rechecking of sputum smear microscopy in Delhi revealed significant errors, highlighting the need for improved supervision of peripheral microscopy centres and senior tuberculosis laboratory supervisors.
Area of Science:
- Medical Diagnostics
- Public Health Microbiology
- Tuberculosis Research
Background:
- Sputum smear microscopy is the primary diagnostic tool for tuberculosis (TB) in developing nations.
- Ensuring the quality of smear microscopy is vital for accurate TB diagnosis and patient management.
- The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) relies heavily on microscopy services.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of random blinded rechecking as a quality assurance measure for sputum smear microscopy.
- To identify the sources and types of errors in TB diagnosis at peripheral microscopy centres and intermediate reference laboratories.
- To evaluate the performance of Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) in smear rechecking.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study was conducted in Delhi, involving the random blinded rechecking of 12,162 sputum slides.
- Slides were re-read by STLS at an intermediate reference laboratory after coding.
- Data analysis focused on identifying discrepant results and categorizing error types (false-positive, false-negative, quantification).
Main Results:
- A total of 204 discrepant results (1.68%) were identified out of 12,162 re-read slides.
- The majority of errors (73.5%) originated from peripheral microscopy centres, while 26.5% were attributed to STLS.
- High rates of false-negative errors (25%) and false-positive errors (8%) were observed, alongside minor errors in quantification and positivity.
Conclusions:
- The current system of random blinded rechecking requires enhanced supervision at the district level to improve efficiency and accuracy.
- Strengthening quality assurance mechanisms is essential to minimize diagnostic errors in TB detection.
- Addressing errors at both peripheral and intermediate levels is critical for reliable tuberculosis diagnosis.

