Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

29.6K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
29.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

673
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
673
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

13.4K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
13.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.2K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimal, superficial DNA damage in human skin from filtered far-ultraviolet C.

The British journal of dermatology·2021
Same author

A feasibility study of microwave therapy for precancerous actinic keratosis.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

Group And Individual Regularities In Trait Inference: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

MULTIMETHOD FACTOR ANALYSIS: A REFORMULATION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The Dimensionality Of Psychopathology Descriptors.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Harry H. Harman (1913-1376).

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment
09:11

Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment

Published on: April 21, 2022

3.1K

TESTING THE NULL HYPOTHESIS FOR ROTATION TO A TARGET.

D N Jackson, M E Morf

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 26, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a method to compare factor rotation to a hypothesized target versus a random target. Results show that the hypothesized target significantly improves data fit compared to random rotation.

    More Related Videos

    Using Unidirectional Rotations to Improve Vestibular System Asymmetry in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction
    05:02

    Using Unidirectional Rotations to Improve Vestibular System Asymmetry in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction

    Published on: August 30, 2019

    7.8K
    Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
    06:36

    Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

    Published on: October 18, 2024

    1.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

    Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment
    09:11

    Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment

    Published on: April 21, 2022

    3.1K
    Using Unidirectional Rotations to Improve Vestibular System Asymmetry in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction
    05:02

    Using Unidirectional Rotations to Improve Vestibular System Asymmetry in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction

    Published on: August 30, 2019

    7.8K
    Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
    06:36

    Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

    Published on: October 18, 2024

    1.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Psychometrics
    • Statistical Analysis

    Background:

    • Factor rotation is crucial for interpreting complex data structures.
    • Comparing hypothesized factor structures to random targets is essential for validation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose and demonstrate a method for evaluating factor rotation improvement.
    • To compare the fit of a hypothesized target rotation against a random target rotation.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a novel method to assess factor rotation quality.
    • Transformed the hypothesized target matrix to create an orthogonal random target.
    • Applied the method to a factor matrix of content and response style measures.

    Main Results:

    • The hypothesized target rotation demonstrated a superior fit to the data.
    • The proposed method quantitatively distinguishes between meaningful and random factor solutions.
    • Significant improvement in data representation was observed with the hypothesized target.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method effectively estimates the improvement offered by hypothesized factor rotations.
    • Hypothesized target rotations provide a more robust and interpretable factor structure than random targets.
    • This approach enhances the validity of factor analysis in psychological and content research.