Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distinguishing Trait And Method Variance In Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: A Reply To Golding.

D N Jackson

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 26, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Minimal, superficial DNA damage in human skin from filtered far-ultraviolet C.

    The British journal of dermatology·2021
    Same author

    A feasibility study of microwave therapy for precancerous actinic keratosis.

    The British journal of dermatology·2020
    Same author

    Group And Individual Regularities In Trait Inference: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    MULTIMETHOD FACTOR ANALYSIS: A REFORMULATION.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    The Dimensionality Of Psychopathology Descriptors.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    Harry H. Harman (1913-1376).

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same journal

    Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2026
    Same journal

    A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2026
    Same journal

    Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2026
    Same journal

    A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2026
    Same journal

    Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2026
    Same journal

    betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2026
    See all related articles

    This study critiques methods for evaluating convergent and discriminant validity, finding them inadequate for assessing multitrait-multimethod matrices. It suggests alternative approaches for trait and method variance analysis are needed.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychometrics
    • Statistical Analysis

    Background:

    • The Campbell and Fiske (1959) framework established criteria for convergent and discriminant validity.
    • Evaluating multitrait-multimethod matrices is crucial for construct validation in psychological research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the adequacy of proposed techniques for analyzing multitrait-multimethod matrices.
    • To identify limitations in existing methods for assessing convergent and discriminant validity.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of Golding and Seidman's (1974) proposal for multitrait-multimethod matrix evaluation.
    • Examination of Golding's (1976) conjecture regarding trait and method variance in factor analysis.

    Main Results:

    • Golding and Seidman's method was found inadequate due to inconsistencies with Campbell-Fiske requirements, confounding variances, and lack of clear variance isolation techniques.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Golding's conjecture was based on redefinition of terms and lacked empirical verification.
  • The proposed methods yielded problematic results when applied to matrices meeting validity criteria.
  • Conclusions:

    • Existing methods for evaluating multitrait-multimethod matrices require revision.
    • Empirical evaluation of trait and method variance can proceed through inductive generalization and theory, not solely relying on nomological networks.