Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

9.1K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
9.1K
Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

4.1K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
4.1K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

8.5K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
8.5K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.6K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.6K
Variation01:19

Variation

8.3K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
8.3K
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

4.3K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BRIEF REPORT: THE DISTRIBUTION OF PARTIAL CORRELATIONS AND GENERALIZATIONS.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Regions of Significance in Multiple Regression Analysis.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

BRIEF REPORT: THE USE OF HIGHLY CORRELATED PREDICTORS IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A GENERALIZATION OF VECTOR CORRELATION AND ITS RELATION TO CANONICAL CORRELATION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The Anti-aggregating Peptide KRDS Impairs a-granule Release, Whereas RGDS Does Not.

Platelets·2010
Same author

Redistribution of granulophysin and SRC protein in normal and gray platelets after activation.

Platelets·2010
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
06:50

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression

Published on: November 8, 2019

7.1K

The Relation Between Rao's Paradox in Discriminate Analysis and Regression Analysis.

E M Cramer

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 27, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study clarifies a discriminant analysis paradox where variables lose discriminatory power in combination. An exact relationship to regression analysis paradoxes is revealed, explained by an F statistic expression.

    More Related Videos

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    3.0K
    Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
    13:44

    Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

    Published on: August 30, 2013

    43.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

    O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
    06:50

    O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression

    Published on: November 8, 2019

    7.1K
    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    3.0K
    Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
    13:44

    Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

    Published on: August 30, 2013

    43.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Multivariate statistics
    • Statistical modeling

    Background:

    • A paradox exists in discriminant analysis where individual variables show group discrimination, but not when combined.
    • This phenomenon has been noted by Rao and requires statistical explanation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explain the paradox in discriminant analysis where combined variables lose discriminatory power.
    • To establish the relationship between this discriminant analysis paradox and similar paradoxes in regression analysis.
    • To provide a clear statistical expression for the F statistic in discriminant analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Mathematical derivation to establish relationships between discriminant and regression analysis.
    • Formulation of an expression for the F statistic in discriminant analysis.
    • Analysis of the F statistic in terms of the average of squares of the t-value.

    Main Results:

    • An exact mathematical relationship is demonstrated between the discriminant analysis paradox and regression analysis paradoxes.
    • A novel expression for the F statistic in discriminant analysis is derived.
    • The F statistic expression clarifies the relationship by using the average of squares of the t-value.

    Conclusions:

    • The paradox in discriminant analysis is statistically explained and linked to regression analysis.
    • The derived F statistic expression provides a clearer understanding of variable interactions in discriminant analysis.
    • This work offers insights into the behavior of statistical models with multiple predictor variables.