Stakeholder Views of Clinical Trials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Pathma D Joseph1, Patrina H Y Caldwell2, Allison Tong3

  • 1Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, and The Pharmacy Department, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia pathma.joseph@health.nsw.gov.au.

Pediatrics
|January 28, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Conducting clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for children is complex. Effective community engagement and culturally relevant trial design are crucial for improving equity and health outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Pediatric Clinical Trials
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Clinical trials are vital for advancing pediatric healthcare.
  • Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear 98% of the global disease burden but conduct only 25% of child health trials.
  • Limited research exists on conducting trials in children within LMICs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore stakeholder perspectives on conducting clinical trials in children within LMICs.
  • To identify challenges and facilitators for pediatric clinical trial implementation in resource-limited settings.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted.
  • Electronic databases were searched up to August 2014.
  • Thematic synthesis was used to analyze findings from 39 studies across 22 countries.

Main Results:

  • Five key themes emerged: community engagement, awareness of vulnerability and poverty, power differentials, adapting research to local contexts, and fair benefit distribution.
  • Stakeholders highlighted the importance of community involvement, addressing mistrust, and mitigating exploitation fears.
  • Cultural beliefs, poverty, and ethical pluralism significantly influence trial conduct and outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Conducting pediatric trials in LMICs is challenging due to socioeconomic, cultural, and historical factors contributing to inequity and mistrust.
  • Enhanced community engagement, capacity building, and pragmatic, ethical trial design are essential.
  • Improving trial equity and health outcomes for children in LMICs requires addressing these complex issues.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
11.1K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
522
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
207
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K