Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Ventilator-Related Adverse Events: A Taxonomy and Findings From 3 Incident Reporting Systems
Julius Cuong Pham1, Tamara L Williams2, Erin M Sparnon3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
A public-private partnership (P5S) successfully tested a common taxonomy for analyzing ventilator adverse events. This collaboration demonstrated feasibility in comparing safety data across different reporting systems, improving patient safety insights.
Area of Science:
- Medical Safety
- Health Informatics
- Public Health
Background:
- Established in 2009, the Promotion of Patient Safety (P5S) initiative aimed to foster public-private collaboration for advancing patient safety.
- Key partners included Johns Hopkins University, the FDA, and the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC).
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the P5S model for understanding ventilator-related safety issues.
- To develop a standardized classification system for mechanical ventilator adverse events.
- To compare adverse event reporting across multiple systems.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional analysis of ventilator adverse events reported in 2012 was conducted.
- Data were sourced from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority, UHC's Safety Intelligence database, and the FDA's MAUDE database.
- Narrative descriptions of events were reviewed and classified using a common taxonomy.
Main Results:
- Searches yielded 252 (Pennsylvania), 274 (FDA), and 700 (UHC) relevant reports.
- Commonly reported events across UHC and Pennsylvania systems included airway/breathing circuit issues, human factors, and ventilator malfunctions.
- The FDA primarily reported ventilator malfunctions, power source issues, and alarm failures.
Conclusions:
- A common taxonomy enables the evaluation of adverse events from diverse reporting systems.
- Reported event types varied significantly based on database purpose and data source.
- The P5S model proved feasible for public-private collaboration in investigating ventilator safety.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...

