Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Single-Cell Factor Localization on Chromatin using Ultra-Low Input Cleavage Under Targets and Release using Nuclease
Published on: February 1, 2022
Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features
Sunil Kumar1,2, Philipp Bucher3,4
1Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences, EPFL, Station 15, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland. kumar.sunil@epfl.ch.
Understanding transcription factor (TF) binding requires more than DNA sequence. Chromatin accessibility and histone modifications are key predictors of TF recruitment, varying by TF and cell type.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Transcription factor (TF) recruitment to DNA target sites is vital for gene regulation.
- DNA sequence binding affinity alone poorly predicts in vivo TF occupancy and cell-type specificity.
- Chromatin accessibility, nucleosome occupancy, and histone modifications significantly influence TF binding in vivo.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply machine-learning models to predict TF target site occupancy.
- To assess the relative importance of DNA sequence-intrinsic and chromatin features in TF recruitment.
- To understand the mechanisms of cell-type specific TF binding.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ENCODE consortium data for five transcription factors (CTCF, JunD, REST, GABP, USF2) across multiple cell types.
- Analyzed predicted TF binding sites and cell-type specific peak lists.
- Computed sequence-intrinsic features and experimental chromatin features (histone modifications, DNase I hypersensitivity).
- Employed machine learning for binary classification and regression to predict TF site occupancy and binding strength.
Main Results:
- Feature importance varied significantly across the five TFs.
- Position weight matrix (PWM) scores were important for CTCF and REST, but not JunD or USF2.
- Chromatin accessibility and active histone marks effectively predicted binding for most TFs, except REST.
- Repressive histone marks and structural DNA parameters showed limited predictive value.
Conclusions:
- Developed a computational framework to analyze DNA-intrinsic and chromatin features for cell-type specific TF binding.
- The framework provides insights into transcription regulatory processes.
- This methodology can be applied to larger datasets for further understanding of gene regulation.
More Related Videos
12:29Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis
Published on: April 16, 2018
09:52Generation of High Quality Chromatin Immunoprecipitation DNA Template for High-throughput Sequencing ChIP-seq
Published on: April 19, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
Transcription Factors
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells
Compact chromatin makes reprogramming difficult. Enzymes, such as histone demethylases and acetyltransferases, are often added during reprogramming to loosen the chromatin, making the DNA more accessible to transcription factors. Molecules that inhibit histone...
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins
General Transcription Factors