Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.5K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.5K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

9.1K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
9.1K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.8K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.8K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.1K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.1K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

537
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
537

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On Estimating the Precision of Individual Test Scores: A Note on Pfadt, Molenaar, Hurks, and Sijtsma.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Proportion Explained Component Variance in Second-Order Scales: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Approach.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

The One-Parameter Logistic Model Can Be True With Zero Probability for a Unidimensional Measuring Instrument: How One Could Go Wrong Removing Items Not Satisfying the Model.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Evaluating Change in Adjusted <i>R</i>-Square and <i>R</i>-Square Indices: A Latent Variable Method Application.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Fatigue in hematological cancer changes across chemotherapy trajectory within the context of IL-6, not hemoglobin level: evidence from growth curve modeling.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2025
Same author

An Omega-Hierarchical Extension Index for Second-Order Constructs With Hierarchical Measuring Instruments.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.0K

Analytic Estimation of Standard Error and Confidence Interval for Scale Reliability.

Tenko Raykov

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 30, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a new analytic method for estimating the standard error and confidence intervals of scale reliability using fixed congeneric measures. This approach enhances the precision of reliability estimates for behavioral scales and multi-component instruments.

    More Related Videos

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
    15:00

    A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

    Published on: February 7, 2025

    1.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

    Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
    09:36

    Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

    Published on: February 2, 2017

    28.0K
    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
    15:00

    A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

    Published on: February 7, 2025

    1.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Psychometrics
    • Statistical Modeling
    • Behavioral Measurement

    Background:

    • Composite reliability is widely estimated in scale development.
    • Existing methods often lack robust standard error and confidence interval estimation for reliability.
    • Assessing the precision of reliability estimates is crucial for scale validation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose an analytic approach for standard error and confidence interval estimation of scale reliability.
    • To provide a method for evaluating the precision of reliability estimates for fixed congeneric measures.
    • To complement existing point estimation methods for composite reliability.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing the delta method, a general procedure for evaluating estimator stability.
    • Applying the analytic approach to scale reliability estimation with fixed congeneric measures.
    • Illustrating the method with a numerical example.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed analytic approach provides a framework for estimating standard errors and confidence intervals for scale reliability.
    • The method allows for the evaluation of estimate precision for composite reliability.
    • The delta method proves effective for assessing estimator stability in this context.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed analytic approach offers a valuable tool for psychometricians and researchers.
    • It enhances the understanding of reliability estimation precision for behavioral and multi-component instruments.
    • This method contributes to more rigorous scale construction and development.