Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

44.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
44.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

80.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
80.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.6K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

267
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
267
Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis01:08

Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis

4.4K
Every mathematical equation that connects separate distinct physical quantities must be dimensionally consistent, which implies it must abide by two rules. For this reason, the concept of dimension is crucial. The first rule is that an equation's expressions on either side of an equality must have the exact same dimension, i.e., quantities of the same dimension can be added or removed. The second rule stipulates that all popular mathematical functions, such as exponential, logarithmic, and...
4.4K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

123
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
123

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proportion Explained Component Variance in Second-Order Scales: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Approach.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Evaluating Change in Adjusted <i>R</i>-Square and <i>R</i>-Square Indices: A Latent Variable Method Application.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

An Omega-Hierarchical Extension Index for Second-Order Constructs With Hierarchical Measuring Instruments.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

A Note on Evaluation of Polytomous Item Locations With the Rating Scale Model and Testing Its Fit.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Studying Factorial Invariance With Nominal Items: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Procedure.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Can One Pool Over Site in a Multi-Site Study With Categorical Item Measuring Instruments? A Multiple Testing Procedure.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.0K

The One-Parameter Logistic Model Can Be True With Zero Probability for a Unidimensional Measuring Instrument: How One

Tenko Raykov1, Bingsheng Zhang2

  • 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement
|August 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The one-parameter logistic (1PL) model or Rasch model may not fit unidimensional scales. Removing items not fitting these models can lead to misleading ability estimates and increased errors in educational and behavioral research.

Keywords:
Rasch modelconstraintlatent dimensionmeasureone-parameter modelreparameterizationtwo-parameter modelunidimensionality

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Behavioral Research

Background:

  • The one-parameter logistic (1PL) model and Rasch model are foundational in psychometrics for analyzing unidimensional scales.
  • Assessing the probability of these models holding true for dichotomous items is crucial for scale validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the probability of the 1PL or Rasch model being true for unidimensional scales with dichotomous items.
  • To explore the consequences of removing items that do not fit these models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the probability of 1PL/Rasch model adherence for unidimensional scales.
  • Simulation studies using large datasets to examine item elimination effects.

Main Results:

  • The probability of the 1PL or Rasch model being correct can be zero even for unidimensional scales.
  • Removing items not fitting these models can result in seriously misleading ability estimates.
  • Item elimination leads to increased standard errors and prediction errors for the latent trait.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must be cautious when removing items based solely on 1PL/Rasch model fit.
  • Misleading ability estimates can have significant implications for educational and behavioral research findings.
  • Alternative approaches to scale refinement may be necessary to ensure accurate measurement.