Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

06:25
Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform
Published on: February 12, 2014
8.9K
Impulse source localization in an urban environment: Time reversal versus time matching
Sylvain Cheinet1, Loïc Ehrhardt1, Thierry Broglin1
1French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis, 5 rue du Général Cassagnou, BP 70034, 68 301 Saint-Louis, France.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 1, 2016
Summary
This study compares two methods for pinpointing impulse sound sources in cities using sensors. Time matching localization achieved 10-meter accuracy, outperforming time reversal, which struggled with distant sensors.
Area of Science:
- Acoustics
- Signal Processing
- Urban Environmental Monitoring
Background:
- Accurate localization of impulse sound sources in urban environments is crucial for various applications.
- Existing methods face challenges with signal propagation complexities and real-time processing constraints.
- Distributed sensor networks offer potential for improved sound source localization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare two distinct sound source localization techniques using a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) model.
- To evaluate the performance of these techniques under controlled processing times in an urban setting.
- To determine the accuracy and practical feasibility of each localization approach.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) numerical model for sound propagation simulation.
- Implemented two localization techniques: time reversal and time matching using a pre-defined simulation database.
- Accelerated simulations by focusing on lower frequencies of impulse signals.
- Validated methods against in situ measurements with varying numbers of sensors (5-15) and source positions.
Main Results:
- The time matching localization technique achieved the targeted 10-meter accuracy in most configurations.
- Time reversal localization performance was hindered by signal masking and distance effects from sensors.
- The study analyzed localization performance based on physical measurements and sensor network configurations.
Conclusions:
- Time matching localization demonstrates superior accuracy and robustness compared to time reversal for urban impulse sound source localization.
- The FDTD model, when optimized for lower frequencies, provides an efficient simulation tool.
- Practical considerations such as real-time processing and hardware requirements are critical for deployment.

