Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019
Alternative Stimulation Intensities for Mapping Cortical Motor Area with Navigated TMS
Elisa Kallioniemi1,2, Petro Julkunen3,4
1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland. elisa.kallioniemi@kuh.fi.
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping may benefit from using an upper threshold (UT) rather than fixed percentages of resting motor threshold (rMT). UT potentially reduces inter-individual variation in functional motor area representation size.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used for pre-operative mapping of functional motor areas.
- Current practice often uses suprathreshold stimulation intensities relative to the patient's resting motor threshold (rMT), but lacks consensus on optimal intensity selection.
- Variability in stimulation intensity selection can influence the accuracy and reproducibility of motor mapping.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of different stimulation intensities for nTMS motor mapping.
- To investigate the impact of using an upper threshold (UT) versus fixed percentages of rMT on motor representation size and variability.
- To determine the optimal stimulation intensity for reliable pre-surgical motor area delineation.
Main Methods:
- The study involved 12 healthy volunteers undergoing nTMS mapping of their left motor cortices.
- Motor evoked potentials were recorded using stimulation intensities of 110% rMT, 120% rMT, and an upper threshold (UT) derived from the Mills-Nithi algorithm.
- Representation sizes and their inter-individual variance were analyzed across the different stimulation intensity conditions.
Main Results:
- The upper threshold (UT) was significantly lower than 120% rMT but not significantly different from 110% rMT.
- Motor representation areas were significantly smaller with 120% rMT compared to both UT and 110% rMT.
- The variance in representation size was lowest with UT, suggesting reduced inter-individual variability.
Conclusions:
- The upper threshold (UT) appears to be a suitable stimulation intensity for nTMS motor mapping.
- Utilizing UT may provide more consistent and reliable delineation of functional motor areas compared to fixed suprathreshold intensities.
- This approach could minimize inter-individual variations in motor mapping, benefiting pre-surgical planning and radiosurgery.
More Related Videos
09:16Study Design for Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Speech Cortical Mapping
Published on: March 24, 2023
12:13Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025