Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
Published on: December 16, 2013
Observation of potentially troublesome (2) JCC correlations in 1,1-ADEQUATE spectra
Josep Saurí1, Yizhou Liu1, R Thomas Williamson1
1NMR Structure Elucidation, Process and Analytical Chemistry, Merck & Company, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Abstract:
Despite the tremendous usage of HMBC to establish long-range (1) H-(13) C and (1) H-(15) N heteronuclear correlations, an inherent drawback of the experiment is the indeterminate nature of the (n) JXH correlations afforded by the experiment. A priori there is no reliable way of determining whether a given (n) JCH correlation is, for example, via two-, three-, or sometimes even four-bonds. This limitation of the HMBC experiment spurred the development of the ADEQUATE family of NMR experiments that rely on, in the case of 1,1-ADEQUATE, an out-and-back transfer of magnetization via the (1) JCC homonuclear coupling constant, which is significantly larger than (n) JCC (where n = 2-4) couplings in most cases. Hence, the 1,1-ADEQUATE experiment has generally been assumed to unequivocally provide the equivalent of (2) JCH correlations. The recent development of the 1,1- and 1,n-HD-ADEQUATE experiments that can provide homodecoupling for certain (1) JCC and (n) JCC correlations has increased the sensitivity of the ADEQUATE experiments significantly and can allow acquisition of these data in a fraction of the time required for the original iterations of this pulse sequence. With these gains in sensitivity, however, there occasionally come unanticipated consequences. We have observed that the collapse of proton multiplets, in addition to providing better s/n for the desired (1) JCC correlations can facilitate the observation of typically weaker (2) JCC correlations across intervening carbonyl resonances in 1,1-HD-ADEQUATE spectra. Several examples are shown, with the results supported by the measurement of the (2) JCC coupling constants in question using J-modulated-HD-ADEQUATE and DFT calculations. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
UV–Vis Spectroscopy of Conjugated Systems
One of the factors influencing λmax is the extent of conjugation in...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

