Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Empathy02:34

Empathy

10.2K
Some researchers suggest that altruism operates on empathy. Empathy is the capacity to understand another person’s perspective, to feel what he or she feels. An empathetic person makes an emotional connection with others and feels compelled to help (Batson, 1991). Empathy can be expressed in several ways, including cognitive, affective, and motor. 
10.2K
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

503
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in...
503
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.2K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.2K
Introducing Social Perception01:29

Introducing Social Perception

549
Perceiving others accurately is fundamental to effective communication and relationship-building. Social perception, a key concept in social psychology, refers to the cognitive processes through which individuals gather and interpret information about others to understand their actions, intentions, and motivations. This process extends beyond spoken words and overt behaviors, incorporating subtle nonverbal cues and contextual factors.Nonverbal Cues and Their SignificanceNonverbal cues play a...
549
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

18.0K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
18.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Internal Consistency of Self-report Anxiety Measures for Autistic Adults Without Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2026
Same author

Reality monitoring across disorders of reality: Systematic and narrative reviews of dissociation and psychosis.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026
Same author

Three international studies on pure coordination games: Adaptable solutions when intuitions are presumed to vary.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

A competitive edge: how social cues and spatial congruence influence joint attention in addressed or witnessed interactions.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Longitudinal development of theory of mind in adolescence and its associations with fiction reading experience.

Developmental psychology·2025
Same author

Defining key concepts for mental state attribution.

Communications psychology·2024
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.6K

I've got your number: Spontaneous perspective-taking in an interactive task.

Andrew Surtees1, Ian Apperly2, Dana Samson3

  • 1University catholique de Louvain, Belgium; University of Birmingham, UK.

Cognition
|February 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

In joint action tasks, people implicitly consider their partner's perspective, improving performance when viewpoints align. This social cognition effect emerges after observing partner involvement.

Keywords:
Joint actionPerspective-takingTheory of mind

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.6K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Considering others' perspectives typically requires conscious effort.
  • Joint action paradigms demonstrate social context influences cognitive processing.
  • The role of implicit perspective-taking in collaborative tasks is under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals implicitly represent their partner's viewpoint in a collaborative task.
  • To determine the conditions under which this implicit perspective-taking occurs.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in a number magnitude judgment task, playing alone or with a partner.
  • Performance was compared when partners shared or differed in their visual representation of the stimulus.
  • Two further experiments manipulated partner involvement and attentional focus.

Main Results:

  • Team play improved performance when partners shared the same visual interpretation of numbers (e.g., both seeing '8').
  • Performance benefits were contingent on prior observation of the partner's involvement in the task.
  • The specific stimulus feature attended to by the partner did not need to match the feature judged by the participant.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals implicitly incorporate a partner's perspective during joint action, even without explicit instruction.
  • This effect is modulated by perceived partner engagement and shared context.
  • Findings suggest a more automatic social cognitive mechanism operating in collaborative settings.