Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of dichlorphenamide in periodic paralysis
Valeria A Sansone1, James Burge2, Michael P McDermott2
1From NEMO Clinical Center (V.A.S.) and IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (G.M.), University of Milan, Italy; MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases (J.B., M.G.H.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; University of Rochester (M.P.M., P.C.S., B.H., R.T., S.P., E.C., R.C.G.), NY; Ohio State University (J.K.), Columbus; UCLA Medical Center (P.S.), Los Angeles, CA; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine (J.W.R.); Brigham and Women's Hospital (A.A.), Boston, MA; UT Southwestern Medical Center (S.C.C., J.T.), Dallas, TX; University of Kansas Medical Center (R.B.), Kansas City; Mayo Clinic (B.C.), Rochester MN; Columbia University (H.M.), New York, NY; Washington University (A.P.), St. Louis, MO; and the Office of Clinical Research (R.C.), NINDS, Bethesda, MD. valeria.sansone@unimi.it.
Objective:
To determine the short-term and long-term effects of dichlorphenamide (DCP) on attack frequency and quality of life in hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis.
Methods:
Two multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials lasted 9 weeks (Class I evidence), followed by a 1-year extension phase in which all participants received DCP. Forty-four HOP and 21 HYP participants participated. The primary outcome variable was the average number of attacks per week over the final 8 weeks of the double-blind phase.
Results:
The median attack rate was lower in HOP participants on DCP than in participants on placebo (0.3 vs 2.4, p = 0.02). The 9-week mean change in the Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form-36 was also better in HOP participants receiving DCP (treatment effect = 7.29 points, 95% confidence interval 2.26 to 12.32, p = 0.006). The median attack rate was also lower in HYP participants on DCP (0.9 vs 4.8) than in participants on placebo, but the difference in median attack rate was not significant (p = 0.10). There were no significant effects of DCP on muscle strength or muscle mass in either trial. The most common adverse events in both trials were paresthesia (47% DCP vs 14% placebo, both trials combined) and confusion (19% DCP vs 7% placebo, both trials combined).
Conclusions:
DCP is effective in reducing the attack frequency, is safe, and improves quality of life in HOP periodic paralysis.
Classification Of Evidence:
These studies provide Class I evidence that DCP significantly reduces attack frequency in HOP but lacked the precision to support either efficacy or lack of efficacy of DCP in HYP.
More Related Videos
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
08:22Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: An Update on Safety and Tolerability
Published on: October 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...