Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protecting Future Children from In-Utero Harm.

Dominic Wilkinson, Loane Skene, Lachlan De Crespigny

    Bioethics
    |February 13, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Should Terminal Sedation Be Expanded to Individuals Who Choose to Die Via the Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking?

    Bioethics·2026
    Same author

    Parfitian Priority, Gene Therapy, and Disability.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same author

    Ethical, legal, and social issues of AI use in emergency healthcare: a scoping review.

    BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
    Same author

    Ethical considerations for semaglutide use in children.

    Archives of disease in childhood·2026
    Same author

    The Problem (and the Value) of Radical Moral Disagreement.

    Wellcome open research·2025
    Same author

    Is <i>Consent-GPT</i> valid? Public attitudes to generative AI use in surgical consent.

    AI & society·2025
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    The law often doesn't protect fetuses from maternal actions causing harm. This article argues for legal intervention to prevent serious fetal injury, even without fetal personhood, using maternal alcohol use as a case study.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Legal Studies
    • Medical Law

    Background:

    • Maternal actions can harm fetuses, yet legal intervention is limited.
    • Pregnant women have autonomy, while fetuses lack legal rights.
    • Contradictory legal responses exist regarding fetal protection versus post-natal child rights.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the justification for legal intervention to prevent fetal injury.
    • To explore ethical and legal arguments for protecting a future child, irrespective of fetal personhood.
    • To analyze the case of maternal alcohol consumption and its impact on fetal development.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal principles and ethical arguments.
    • Analysis of existing legal frameworks concerning maternal autonomy and fetal rights.
    Keywords:
    fetal alcohol spectrum disordersfetuslawmedical ethicspregnancy

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study approach focusing on excessive maternal alcohol intake.

    • Main Results:

    • Current legal systems often prioritize maternal autonomy over fetal protection.
    • There's a legal and ethical basis for intervention to prevent serious, preventable fetal harm.
    • The concept of fetal personhood is not essential for arguing intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • Legal intervention is ethically and legally justifiable to prevent serious fetal harm, regardless of fetal status.
    • Existing legal contradictions highlight the need for clearer guidelines on protecting future children.
    • Policy should consider the long-term well-being of the child, even when fetal personhood is debated.