Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness
Xiao-nan Yu1, Ding Bai, Xue Feng
1*Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing †Department of Orthodontics, Guanghua School and Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou ‡Department of Orthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu §Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an ||Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai ¶Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing #Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing **Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan ††Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Orthodontists showed moderate agreement in ranking facial attractiveness. Cephalometric measures had a weaker association with perceived attractiveness than expected, with specific angles influencing Class I and Class II malocclusion aesthetics.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Aesthetic Dentistry
- Facial Analysis
Background:
- Facial attractiveness is a key outcome in orthodontic treatment.
- Understanding the correlation between objective cephalometric measurements and subjective aesthetic rankings is crucial for treatment planning.
- Previous studies have explored these correlations, but specific findings in the Chinese population require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement among orthodontists in ranking facial attractiveness of patients post-orthodontic treatment.
- To investigate the correlation between standard cephalometric measurements and the perceived facial attractiveness in Chinese patients with Class I, II, and III malocclusions.
Main Methods:
- 108 Chinese patients (equal distribution of Class I, II, III malocclusions) post-orthodontic treatment were photographed (frontal, lateral, smiling).
- 69 experienced Chinese orthodontists ranked the patients' facial attractiveness based on the photographs.
- Spearman rank-order correlation assessed inter-judge agreement; Pearson correlation and multivariate regression analyzed cephalometric measures against attractiveness rankings.
Main Results:
- High agreement (96.68%) was found between judge pairs, with moderate correlations (0.4 ≤ rs < 0.7).
- For Class I malocclusion, interincisal angle, L1/MP°, L1-NBmm, L1/NB°, and profile angle significantly correlated with attractiveness (32.8% explained variance).
- For Class II malocclusion, ANB angle, angle of convexity, profile angle, Li to E-line, Li to B-line, and Z angle showed significant correlations (43.3% explained variance).
Conclusions:
- There was a less pronounced association between lateral cephalometric measurements and clinicians' aesthetic rankings than anticipated in the Chinese population.
- A straight lower incisor position is desirable for Class I malocclusion facial attractiveness.
- Sagittal jaw relationships and lip prominence are key factors influencing the aesthetics of Class II malocclusion in Chinese patients.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Relationship Formation
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits

