Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

383
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
383
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

1.1K
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
1.1K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

1.1K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.1K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

15.4K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interesterified fats rich in palmitic and stearic acids have comparable effects on selected inflammatory related biomarkers.

European journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Serious learning through play: a decade of the Self-Directed Learning Playground.

Korean journal of medical education·2026
Same author

Relationship Between Inspirational Teaching and Self-Directed Learning in Health Professions Students-A Mixed-Method Study.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2025
Same author

Educational innovation in virtual and augmented reality for health professional education: a Southeast Asian model.

Korean journal of medical education·2025
Same author

Building resilience among undergraduate health professions students: identifying influencing factors.

BMC medical education·2024
Same author

A 3-D interactive microbiology laboratory via virtual reality for enhancing practical skills.

Scientific reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?

Allan Pau1, Yu Sui Chen2, Verna Kar Mun Lee3

  • 1Division of Community and Child Oral Health, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; allan_pau@imu.edu.my.

Medical Education Online
|February 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary

The multiple mini interview (MMI) correlates with the panel interview (PI) for medical school applicants. The MMI may better assess interpersonal skills and is acceptable across diverse applicant groups.

Keywords:
multiple mini interviewpanel interviewstudents admissionstudents selection

More Related Videos

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
07:14

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

625
Author Spotlight: Unlocking Insights into the Immune Cell Landscape of Tumors
06:32

Author Spotlight: Unlocking Insights into the Immune Cell Landscape of Tumors

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
07:14

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

625
Author Spotlight: Unlocking Insights into the Immune Cell Landscape of Tumors
06:32

Author Spotlight: Unlocking Insights into the Immune Cell Landscape of Tumors

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical education research
  • Admissions assessment

Background:

  • Traditional panel interviews (PI) are used for medical school admissions.
  • The multiple mini interview (MMI) is an alternative assessment format.
  • Assessing applicant suitability beyond academic metrics is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare multiple mini interview (MMI) performance with panel interview (PI) performance.
  • Evaluate the MMI's ability to identify behavioral concerns.
  • Assess the acceptability of the MMI in a diverse applicant pool.

Main Methods:

  • 133 medical school applicants completed both a PI and an MMI.
  • MMI involved ten 8-minute stations with individual faculty assessment.
  • Applicant acceptability was measured via a questionnaire.

Main Results:

  • MMI scores significantly correlated with PI scores (r=0.438, p=0.001).
  • MMI performance was poorer for applicants flagged with behavioral concerns.
  • MMI acceptability was high across different demographic groups.

Conclusions:

  • The MMI offers a potentially more objective measure of interpersonal skills than the PI.
  • The MMI is a viable and acceptable assessment tool for diverse medical school applicants.
  • MMI effectively identifies behavioral concerns, aiding holistic applicant evaluation.