Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Evaluation and Management of Concomitant Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy and Valvular Aortic Stenosis
John Shenouda1, David Silber1, Mythri Subramaniam1
1From the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Center and the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Winthrop University Hospital, 120 Mineola Blvd, Suite 500, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Insights
Managing patients with both aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) requires careful consideration of hemodynamic interactions. Sequential treatment, such as alcohol septal ablation followed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement, may offer optimal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) often coexist, posing clinical challenges.
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prevalence are increasing, making this dual diagnosis more common.
- Hemodynamic interactions between AS and LVOTO can complicate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical dilemma of managing patients with concomitant AS and LVOTO.
- To present recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of these complex cases.
- To illustrate the importance of treatment sequencing through case examples.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical practice and existing literature.
- Presentation and analysis of three distinct patient cases with AS and LVOTO.
- Discussion of treatment strategies including surgical and percutaneous approaches.
Main Results:
- Case 1: AS correction unmasked a significant LVOTO gradient, leading to decompensation due to rapid afterload reduction.
- Case 2: Successful alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for severe LVOTO allowed delayed aortic valve replacement, avoiding myectomy.
- Case 3: Sequential ASA and TAVR within three months was well-tolerated, suggesting a potentially optimal treatment strategy.
Conclusions:
- The order of treatment for AS and LVOTO is critical for patient outcomes.
- Sequential ASA and TAVR may represent a favorable approach for managing combined AS and LVOTO.
- Continued evolution of ASA and TAVR may expand their application to lower-risk patients with these coexisting conditions.
Opinion Statement:
The dilemma of the patient with both AS and LVOTO is now commonly encountered in clinical practice; indeed, physicians must be aware of the complex interaction and coexistent nature of both diseases, especially as both HOCM and TAVR have increased in awareness and prevalence. Importantly, the clinician must be aware of the complex interplay hemodynamically, with the two diseases confusing the TTE imaging and potentially affecting each other anatomically and clinically. There is no set guideline on how to approach this from a surgical or percutaneous approach, but we have outlined a set of recommendations which should serve the clinician and patient well. The three cases that are presented illustrate that methodical diagnosis in addition to the order of treatment do indeed matter. In the first case, there was AS and an underestimated LVOT gradient that was also present. Once the AS was corrected, the true LVOT gradient potential was evidenced and she decompensated, likely because there was a rapid decrease in afterload. Patients with concomitant LVOTO are not able to adjust quickly to the hemodynamic changes created by the rapid decline in afterload, as, for example, in HOCM patients who receive nitroglycerin. The second case demonstrated that when the LVOTO was severe and the AS nonsignificant (mild or moderate), the patient was able to live without symptoms for several years after successful alcohol septal ablation (ASA). She eventually needed an aortic valve and mitral valve replacement but that was postponed for several years until the AS became more significant, and the surgical risk was lowered by the elimination of the need for concomitant myectomy. In the last case, the patient was able to have both an ASA and TAVR within 3 months of each other without hemodynamic compromise. Indeed, this latter therapy sequence may be the best way to treat patients with both diseases in the future, as both ASA and TAVR continue to evolve into intermediate and lower-risk patient populations and the safety of ASA continues to be evident.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
09:24O-Ring Aortic Banding Versus Traditional Transverse Aortic Constriction for Modeling Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Published on: October 6, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy