Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is an Ecosystem?01:17

What is an Ecosystem?

48.1K
Overview
48.1K
Freshwater Microbial Ecology01:24

Freshwater Microbial Ecology

16
Freshwater systems such as streams, rivers, and lakes exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics that influence their microbial communities. These environments are broadly categorized into lotic systems—those with flowing waters like streams and most rivers—and lentic systems, which include still or slow-moving waters such as lakes, ponds, and marshes.In lentic systems, phytoplankton drive primary production, generating autochthonous organic carbon. In contrast, lotic...
16
Quality of Water01:19

Quality of Water

645
In concrete preparation, the quality of water is paramount as it affects the strength and durability of the concrete. Potable water is usually preferred; however, it must not have excessive sodium or potassium to prevent compromising the concrete's integrity. Water quality is typically evaluated based on impurities such as dissolved solids, chlorides, and sulfates, and its pH value is ideally between 6 and 8. Even slightly acidic natural water may be acceptable unless it contains harmful...
645
Testing Water Quality01:14

Testing Water Quality

451
When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...
451

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accumulation of antimicrobial resistance genes in wild chimpanzees.

The ISME journal·2026
Same author

Addendum: Transmission of MPXV from fire-footed rope squirrels to sooty mangabeys.

Nature·2026
Same author

Reconciling fast Hepatitis B evolutionary rates with ancient co-divergence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Investigating a Skin Disease in Guinea Baboons (Papio papio) Using Non-invasive Methods.

EcoHealth·2026
Same author

Continental-scale genomic surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria across sub-Saharan Africa with rapid nanopore sequencing.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Transmission of MPXV from fire-footed rope squirrels to sooty mangabeys.

Nature·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

741

Aquatic biodiversity assessment for the lazy.

Constanze Hoffmann1, Grit Schubert1,2, Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer1,3

  • 1Epidemiology of Highly Pathogenic Microorganisms, Robert Koch-Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Molecular Ecology
|February 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis offers a cost-effective way to monitor biodiversity. New metabarcoding methods effectively identify multiple species, including fish and amphibians, matching or exceeding traditional surveys.

Keywords:
amphibiansbiodiversityenvironmental DNAfishmetabarcoding

More Related Videos

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

8.1K
Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment
07:57

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment

Published on: September 11, 2018

18.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

741
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

8.1K
Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment
07:57

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment

Published on: September 11, 2018

18.3K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Conservation Biology
  • Molecular Ecology

Background:

  • Extracellular DNA (eDNA) fragments in ecosystems offer a novel source of information on biodiversity.
  • Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been proposed as a method for monitoring vertebrate biodiversity, particularly in aquatic ecosystems.
  • Existing eDNA studies often focus on single or limited numbers of species.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advance the application of eDNA for biodiversity assessment.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of metabarcoding approaches for simultaneously targeting multiple aquatic taxa.
  • To compare the performance of metabarcoding with traditional inventory methods.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized metabarcoding techniques to simultaneously analyze eDNA from multiple groups of aquatic organisms.
  • Targeted specific taxonomic groups such as amphibians and fish.
  • Compared the results obtained from metabarcoding with conventional biodiversity monitoring techniques.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that metabarcoding approaches can effectively identify a wide range of species within aquatic ecosystems.
  • Showcased that metabarcoding eDNA analysis can match, and in some cases, outperform traditional inventory methods.
  • Highlighted the potential of metabarcoding for comprehensive and efficient biodiversity assessments.

Conclusions:

  • Metabarcoding of environmental DNA represents a significant advancement in biodiversity monitoring.
  • This approach offers a powerful tool for ecologists and conservationists, especially for aquatic environments.
  • The method provides a cost-efficient and taxonomically inclusive alternative to conventional survey techniques.