Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Density00:56

Density

20.9K
Density is an important characteristic of substances, crucial in determining whether an object sinks or floats in a fluid. Its SI unit is kg/m3, and its cgs unit is g/cm3. The density of an object helps in identifying its composition, and also reveals information about the phase of the matter and its substructure. The densities of liquids and solids are roughly comparable, consistent with the fact that their atoms are in close contact. However, gases have much lower densities than liquids and...
20.9K
Current Density01:21

Current Density

5.6K
The total amount of current flowing through one unit value of a cross-sectional area is referred to as current density. If the current flow is uniform, the amount of current flowing through a conductor is the same at all points along the conductor, even if the conductor area varies. The current density consists of the local magnitude and direction of the charge flow, which varies from point to point. Current density is measured in amperes per meter square, and direction is defined as the net...
5.6K
Density and Archimedes' Principle01:05

Density and Archimedes' Principle

9.1K
When a lump of clay is dropped into water, it sinks. But if the same lump of clay is molded into the shape of a boat, it starts to float. Because of its shape, the clay boat displaces more water than the lump and experiences a greater buoyant force, even though its mass is the same. The same holds true for steel ships. The average density of an object majorly determines if the object will float. If an object's average density is less than that of the surrounding fluid, it will float. The...
9.1K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

321
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
321
Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model01:14

Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model

81
The link model is a fundamental pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) approach to account for delayed drug responses when the observed effect does not immediately correlate with the drug's plasma concentration peak. This delay is mathematically addressed by introducing an effect compartment concentration, Ce, which is kinetically linked to the plasma concentration, Cp, via a first-order rate constant, ke0. The linkage allows for a more accurate prediction of drug effects over time. A...
81
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

471
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
471

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Should the Pelvic Ring Be Closed After Tumor Resection? A Systematic Review.

Cancers·2026
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on tenosynovial giant cell tumour and giant cell tumour of bone : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Complications of PI to PIII hemipelvic resections for intermediate and malignant tumours : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Uncertainty Quantification for <i>In Silico</i> Chemistry.

Chemical reviews·2026
Same author

Benchmarking of vibrational exciton models against quantum-chemical localized-mode calculations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Arthroplasty and Tennis: A Narrative Review.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Quantifying Cytoskeleton Dynamics Using Differential Dynamic Microscopy
06:37

Quantifying Cytoskeleton Dynamics Using Differential Dynamic Microscopy

Published on: June 15, 2022

4.2K

No need for external orthogonality in subsystem density-functional theory.

Jan P Unsleber1, Johannes Neugebauer1, Christoph R Jacob2

  • 1Theoretische Organische Chemie, Organisch-Chemisches Institut and Center for Multiscale Theory and Computation, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 40, 48149 Münster, Germany. j.neugebauer@uni-muenster.de.

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP
|February 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary

External orthogonality is not strictly required in subsystem density-functional theory (SDFT) for accurate density representation. Calculations show subsystem densities can sum to the supermolecular density, even without this constraint.

More Related Videos

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
08:23

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment

Published on: May 18, 2021

4.1K
Measurement of Particle Size Distribution in Turbid Solutions by Dynamic Light Scattering Microscopy
09:16

Measurement of Particle Size Distribution in Turbid Solutions by Dynamic Light Scattering Microscopy

Published on: January 9, 2017

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Quantifying Cytoskeleton Dynamics Using Differential Dynamic Microscopy
06:37

Quantifying Cytoskeleton Dynamics Using Differential Dynamic Microscopy

Published on: June 15, 2022

4.2K
Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
08:23

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment

Published on: May 18, 2021

4.1K
Measurement of Particle Size Distribution in Turbid Solutions by Dynamic Light Scattering Microscopy
09:16

Measurement of Particle Size Distribution in Turbid Solutions by Dynamic Light Scattering Microscopy

Published on: January 9, 2017

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Density-Functional Theory

Background:

  • Recent studies emphasize the need for externally orthogonal orbitals in subsystem density-functional theory (SDFT).
  • This requirement is crucial for accurately representing electron densities in complex molecular systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-investigate the necessity of externally orthogonal orbitals in subsystem density-functional theory (SDFT).
  • To determine if supermolecular Kohn-Sham-DFT (KS-DFT) densities can be accurately represented without this orthogonality constraint.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical demonstration of density summation.
  • Basis-set-free numerical calculations on atomic systems.
  • SDFT calculations with reconstructed potentials using finite basis sets.

Main Results:

  • Supermolecular KS-DFT densities can be exactly represented as a sum of subsystem densities in the basis-set limit, irrespective of orbital orthogonality.
  • SDFT calculations with accurate potentials approach supermolecular KS-DFT density with finite basis sets.
  • Deviations between SDFT and KS-DFT diminish as the basis-set limit is approached.

Conclusions:

  • External orthogonality is not formally required in SDFT for accurate density representation.
  • While not strictly necessary, external orthogonality may still be a useful strategy for developing specific embedding schemes.