Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Clinical challenges and research progress in variants of uncertain significance of inherited cardiovascular diseases].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2026
Same author

[Essentials and considerations for outpatient genetic counseling for inherited cardiovascular diseases].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2026
Same author

[Distribution characteristics of PKP2 non-synonymous variations in protein domain and genotype-phenotype relationship in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2026
Same author

Intermediate-term risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy following heart transplantation from hepatitis C viremic donors in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy.

JHLT open·2025
Same author

[Sperm donation utilization rates in nonobstructive azoospermia patients under different testicular sperm retrieval methods during assisted reproductive technology cycles].

Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences·2025
Same author

[Electrocardiographic characteristics of cardiomyopathy].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2025
Same journal

Precise Numerical Differentiation of Thermodynamic Functions with Multicomplex Variables.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Characterization of 3-Dimensional Printing and Casting Materials for use in Computed Tomography and X-ray Imaging Phantoms.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

On The Quotient of a Centralized and a Non-centralized Complex Gaussian Random Variable.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Fast Methods for Finding Multiple Effective Influencers in Real Networks.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

DNA Origami Design: A How-To Tutorial.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

8.0K

Optical-Fiber Power Meter Comparison between NIST and KRISS.

I Vayshenker1, S K Kim2, K Hong2

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
|February 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A comparison of optical fiber power measurement standards between NIST-USA and KRISS-R.O. Korea found results within 2.5 parts in 10^3. This demonstrates excellent agreement between the national metrology institutes.", Enhanced_Abstract=default_api.SeocontentEnhancedAbstract(Area_of_Science=[

Keywords:
international comparisonoptical fiberoptical power

More Related Videos

Agarose-based Tissue Mimicking Optical Phantoms for Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy
09:25

Agarose-based Tissue Mimicking Optical Phantoms for Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Published on: August 22, 2018

13.4K
UV-Vis Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media
05:16

UV-Vis Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media

Published on: October 25, 2021

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

8.0K
Agarose-based Tissue Mimicking Optical Phantoms for Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy
09:25

Agarose-based Tissue Mimicking Optical Phantoms for Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Published on: August 22, 2018

13.4K
UV-Vis Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media
05:16

UV-Vis Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media

Published on: October 25, 2021

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Metrology and Measurement Science
  • Optical Engineering
  • National Metrology Institutes

Background:

  • Accurate optical power measurement is critical for telecommunications and photonics.
  • International comparisons ensure consistency of measurement standards.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST-USA) and Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS-R.O. Korea) are leading metrology institutes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the national optical fiber power measurement reference standards of NIST-USA and KRISS-R.O. Korea.
  • To assess the agreement between the two institutes' standards at specific wavelengths.
  • To validate the accuracy and comparability of optical power measurements internationally.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a temperature-controlled optical trap detector for precise measurements.
  • Conducted intercomparison of reference standards at 1302 nm and 1546 nm wavelengths.
  • Analyzed measurement results to determine the difference between the laboratories' standards.

Main Results:

  • The largest difference observed between NIST-USA and KRISS-R.O. Korea reference standards was less than 2.5 parts in 10^3.
  • This difference was within the combined standard uncertainty (k=1) of the measurements.
  • Demonstrated high agreement between the two national metrology institutes' standards.

Conclusions:

  • The reference standards for optical fiber power measurements at NIST-USA and KRISS-R.O. Korea are in excellent agreement.
  • The intercomparison validates the reliability of optical power measurements conducted by both institutes.
  • This supports global consistency in optical metrology.