Naming the Ethological Subject

Area of Science:

• Ethology and Animal Studies
• History of Science
• Animal Ethics

Background:

• The practice of naming nonhuman animals in scientific research has become intertwined with concepts of animal personhood and objectivity.
• Critics associate naming with anthropomorphism, while supporters argue it enhances recognition of individual differences and social relations.

Observation:

• Historical analysis reveals that naming research animals since the late 19th century served diverse functions beyond ethical considerations.
• These functions included identification for dual roles (pets, workers, patients), market value enhancement, and field identification.

Findings:

• The use of personal names by researchers like Jane Goodall is not as unprecedented as it may seem, building on historical practices.
• The historical application of names demonstrates a variety of purposes, many of which did not raise significant ethical or epistemological concerns.

Implications:

• The widespread use of personal names to signify individuality, sentience, or rights in nonhuman animals faces inherent limitations and contradictions.
• Understanding the multifaceted history of naming research animals provides a nuanced perspective on current debates in animal ethics and scientific practice.