Progress of clinical practice on the management of burn-associated pain: Lessons from animal models

Matthew K McIntyre1, John L Clifford1, Christopher V Maani2

  • 1United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3650 Chambers Pass, BHT1:Bldg 3610, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6315, United States.

Insights

Developing new pain relief for burn injuries requires better animal models. Current models don't fully represent burn pain or assess wound healing, necessitating a multi-model approach for effective analgesic development.

Area of Science:

  • Pain research
  • Translational medicine
  • Animal modeling

Background:

  • Opioid analgesics are standard for burn pain but cause significant side effects.
  • Validated animal models are crucial for developing novel burn pain treatments.
  • Existing models primarily focus on rodent models of burn, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing animal models for burn pain research.
  • To identify limitations of current models in mimicking human burn pain.
  • To propose a strategy for more clinically relevant analgesic development.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of rodent models for burn-induced, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain.
  • Analysis of model limitations regarding complex burn pathophysiology.
  • Evaluation of current models' inability to assess wound healing and systemic effects.

Main Results:

  • No single animal model adequately replicates human burn pain and its associated complexities.
  • Current models do not evaluate the impact of analgesics on wound healing.
  • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction are unaddressed in existing models.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-model strategy is recommended for evaluating novel analgesics for burn patients.
  • Future research should focus on models that incorporate wound healing and systemic effects.
  • Improved animal models are essential for advancing burn pain management and analgesic development.