Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Energy Expenditure During Walking With a Novel Treadmill Controller That Induces Gait Asymmetry.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Changes in interlimb coordination induced by within-stride changes in treadmill speed.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Task demands shift motor learning from adaptation to feedback control in a naturalistic bimanual task.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Quantifying Repetitive Hand Flapping Kinematics in Autistic and Non-Autistic Toddlers Using Video-Based Pose Estimation.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Automatic learning mechanisms for flexible human locomotion.

eLife·2026
Same author

Self-Reported Acceptance of a Wearable Activity Monitor in Persons With Stroke: Usability Study.

JMIR cardio·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Blocking trial-by-trial error correction does not interfere with motor learning in human walking.

Andrew W Long1, Ryan T Roemmich2, Amy J Bastian3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Motion Analysis Laboratory, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland; and.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|February 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Human walking adapts implicitly, even when explicit instructions block visible changes in foot placement. This suggests learning occurs internally, independent of overt motor adjustments.

Keywords:
adaptationfeedbackgaitmotor learningwalking

More Related Videos

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
08:04

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

8.8K
Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
08:19

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion

Published on: January 15, 2016

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K
Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
08:04

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

8.8K
Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
08:19

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion

Published on: January 15, 2016

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Locomotion

Background:

  • Motor learning can occur implicitly through environmental adaptation or explicitly via instruction.
  • Implicit motor learning is often studied by observing movement corrections in response to perturbations.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of implicit motor learning is crucial for rehabilitation and skill acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether implicit foot placement learning occurs during human walking even when explicit strategies are used to prevent overt changes.
  • To determine if locomotor adaptation is dependent on observable changes in movement or internal recalibration.

Main Methods:

  • Participants walked on a split-belt treadmill, experiencing different belt speeds.
  • One group received explicit instructions to maintain a specific foot placement, blocking adaptation.
  • Another group walked without explicit instructions, allowing natural adaptation.
  • Post-learning effects were assessed after returning the treadmill belts to the same speed.

Main Results:

  • Participants without explicit instructions implicitly learned to adjust foot placement to minimize step-length asymmetry.
  • Even when explicit instructions blocked observable foot placement changes, participants showed similar post-learning effects.
  • This indicates that motor adaptation can occur without overt changes in the learned motor pattern.

Conclusions:

  • Locomotor adaptation during walking is not solely dependent on explicit changes in motor output.
  • Implicit learning can drive adaptation through internal recalibration of desired movement, even when not expressed behaviorally.
  • This finding challenges traditional views of motor learning and suggests a dissociation between learning and performance.